On June 19, 2012, at a G20 summit in Los Cabos, Mexico, Prime
Minister Stephen Harper announced that Canada would be joining ongoing
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade negotiations. U.S. President Obama
invited Canada and Mexico to join the talks on terms that have not been
made public but which are reported to give the new entrants second-rate
status, with less room to make changes to the agreement as it moves
forward.
The TPP, an Asia-Pacific economic integration pact, now has 11 members: the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam. Japan has also expressed interest in joining the talks, which would reportedly eclipse the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in size and scope.
The TPP is globally controversial because of how it will entrench a myopic vision of market-based globalization that is the main cause of runaway climate change and which has done little to create good, sustainable jobs or reduce poverty worldwide. The TPP also enhances corporate rights to sue governments when public policies interfere with how, when and where they make profits.
In Canada, concerns with the TPP have included: how it could lead to the dismantling of Canada’s important supply management regimes for dairy, poultry and egg production; the race-to-the-bottom potential in a proposed regulatory harmonization chapter; extreme intellectual-property protections for big drug companies that would limit access to life-saving medicines; investor-state provisions that would allow companies to sue governments over rules to protect the environment; government procurement restrictions, and; copyright rules that undermine internet freedom.
There is another (13th) round of TPP talks scheduled for San Diego, California at the beginning of July though it is uncertain when Canada will be allowed to join since Canadian and Mexican participation must be approved by U.S. Congress, which could take 90 days. TPP countries hope to have an agreement finished by the end of 2012 but this deadline is widely seen as overly optimistic.
Key blogs
Source: canadians.org
Author: -
The TPP, an Asia-Pacific economic integration pact, now has 11 members: the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam. Japan has also expressed interest in joining the talks, which would reportedly eclipse the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in size and scope.
The TPP is globally controversial because of how it will entrench a myopic vision of market-based globalization that is the main cause of runaway climate change and which has done little to create good, sustainable jobs or reduce poverty worldwide. The TPP also enhances corporate rights to sue governments when public policies interfere with how, when and where they make profits.
In Canada, concerns with the TPP have included: how it could lead to the dismantling of Canada’s important supply management regimes for dairy, poultry and egg production; the race-to-the-bottom potential in a proposed regulatory harmonization chapter; extreme intellectual-property protections for big drug companies that would limit access to life-saving medicines; investor-state provisions that would allow companies to sue governments over rules to protect the environment; government procurement restrictions, and; copyright rules that undermine internet freedom.
There is another (13th) round of TPP talks scheduled for San Diego, California at the beginning of July though it is uncertain when Canada will be allowed to join since Canadian and Mexican participation must be approved by U.S. Congress, which could take 90 days. TPP countries hope to have an agreement finished by the end of 2012 but this deadline is widely seen as overly optimistic.
Key blogs
- NEWS: Council critiques Canada’s entry into the Trans-Pacific Partnership talks
- We need answers from Harper about the Trans-Pacific Partnership
- TPP: Canada not expected a seat at table until September
- Australian government “will not move” on investor-state dispute process in Trans-Pacific Partnership
- NEWS: Harper pursue 'Trans-Pacific Partnership' free trade agreement
- Canada will need to join global opposition to Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade talks
- NEWS: TPP could eclipse NAFTA
- Protests greet Trans-Pacific trade talks in Malaysia
- Canada peeping in on Trans-Pacific Partnership talks; investment reform urged by U.S. groups
- MEDIA RELEASE: Canada’s entry to Trans-Pacific Partnership trade talks a “coup” for Big Business, not Harper, June 19, 2012
- VIDEO: Council of Canadians Trade Campaigner Stuart Trew on CTV’s PowerPlay discussing the TPP and supply management, June 20, 2012
- MEDIA RELEASE: Canada’s entry to Trans-Pacific Partnership trade talks a “coup” for Big Business, not Harper: Council of Canadians, June 19, 2012
- MEDIA RELEASE: Council of Canadians objects to Canada's participation in Trans-Pacific Partnership trade negotiations, February 15, 2012
- VIDEO: This Could Be Disastrous – A video update from OpenMedia.ca on the Trans-Pacific Partnership announcement, June 20, 2012
- Signing the TPP agreement will lock down our Internet and shackle our democracy. What should we do? – A blog by Steve Anderson of OpenMedia.ca
- Open letter from lawyers to the negotiators of the Trans-Pacific Partnership urging the rejection of investor-state dispute settlement, May 8, 2012
- Submission to the federal government objecting to Canada’s entry into TPP free trade negotiations as part of a public consultation announced in December 2011 by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, February 14, 2012
- The Trans-Pacific Free Trade Agreement
- Leaked TPP Investment Chapter Sparks Outrage – Eyes on Trade blog, June 19, 2012
- Fact sheets and other resources from Public Citizen
- Key Elements of Damaging U.S. Trade Agreement Investment Rules that Must Not Be Replicated in the TPP Include (A joint recommendation from Earthjustice, Friends of the Earth, Institute for Policy Studies, Public Citizen and Sierra Club)
- U.S. proposals on Intellectual Property Rights
- U.S. proposals for pre-grant opposition (patents)
- Other leaked U.S. texts, including: proposals on pharmaceutical pricing and other pharmaceutical provisions; technical barriers to trade on medical devices, pharmaceutical products and cosmetics, and; the Regulatory Coherence chapter
- Some of New Zealand’s proposals on the Intellectual Property chapter
- Some of Chile’s proposals on the Intellectual Property chapter
- Leaked Investment chapter
Source: canadians.org
Author: -
No comments:
Post a Comment