Each development could significantly raise the firepower in a two-year civil war has already killed more than 70,000 people and sent hundreds of thousands fleeing the country. It also comes as the U.S. and Russia are preparing for a major peace conference in Geneva that diplomats have called the best chance yet to end the bloodshed under Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.
The EU move late Monday lifting an arms embargo on Syria sparked broad political fallout Tuesday.
Russia, which has been a strong supporter of the Syrian government, criticized the decision and acknowledged its anti-aircraft missile sale. Israeli answered Russia's pledge by warning that it would be prepared to attack any such missile shipments. EU nations continued to express divisions within their 27-nation bloc over sending arms to the rebels while both sides fighting in Syria spoke out on the decision.
Analysts, however, said the EU's move would have little immediate impact on the fighting.
In Moscow, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov called the EU's decision to end its arms embargo “a manifestation of double standards” that will hurt the prospects for the Geneva talks, which are expected to happen next month.
France and Britain, meanwhile, hope the new EU position can help prod the two sides to the negotiating table in Geneva. EU diplomats have said the two nations are considering providing equipment to the rebels.
Ryabkov confirmed Tuesday that Russia has signed a contract with the Assad government to provide it with state-of-the-art S-300 air defence missiles, which he said were important to prevent foreign intervention in the country. Ryabkov would not say whether Russia has shipped any of the missiles to Syria yet.
Israel has been pressing Moscow not to go through with the delivery of S-300s, fearing that the missiles could slip into the hands of hostile groups like Hezbollah. Defence Minister Moshe Yaalon said Tuesday that Israel believes the missiles have not been shipped, but the military “will know what to do” if they are delivered.
Ryabkov said Russia understood other nations' concerns about providing such weapons to Syria, but said his country believes that may “help restrain some hot-heads considering a scenario to give an international dimension to this conflict.”
The fighting in Syria has threatened lately to drag in neighbours like Turkey and Lebanon.
An official in Britain's Foreign Office, firing back after Russia's announcement, said: “We have stated that we have made no decision to supply arms to Syria. At the same time, Russia has acknowledged publicly that it is providing weapons to the Assad regime. Of course we disapprove strongly of continued arms sales to the regime.”
Britain believes the focus should now be on the “political track,” including the Geneva conference, the official said in a statement.
In Damascus, a Syrian lawmaker on Tuesday criticized the EU decision, saying that efforts to arm the rebels will discourage the opposition from seeking a peaceful solution to the conflict. The comments by Essam Khalil, a member of the ruling Baath Party, were the first by a Syrian official.
Louay Safi, a senior figure in the main Western-backed Syrian opposition group, the Syrian National Coalition, called the EU move a “positive step.” But speaking in Istanbul, where the opposition has been holding talks, he also warned that any delay in deciding to provide weapons means that the Syrian regime could continue killing Syrians.
David Hartwell, a Middle East analyst for IHS Jane's, said in a note that the EU move has “more diplomatic than military weight” and will have “little immediate impact on the battlefield.” He noted news reports in neighbouring Lebanon saying that Assad's forces are planning an offensive to retake rebel-held parts of Aleppo, Syria's largest city, in the north.
The rebels may get Western arms “too late to prevent further government victories, a scenario that might cause the Syrian government to rethink its decision to participate in the Geneva peace conference,” Hartwell wrote.
U.S. Sen. John McCain, meanwhile, made an unannounced visit to rebel forces in Syria, putting more pressure on Assad to seek a negotiated settlement.
There's no certainty, however, that the warring sides will come to the table in Geneva.
Assad's regime has provided no sign of any willingness to cede power in Syria, a key opposition demand before entering any talks. Meanwhile, the opposition could try to make a public show of willingness to attend the talks, only to demand that weapons deliveries from Europe start right away if the hoped-for Geneva process breaks down.
The Syrian opposition remains badly divided. The Al Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra is the most powerful rebel fighting group, and the United States and other Western powers fear that any European weapons could fall into the hands of extremists.
“We have no guarantees about the end user,” Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders told a public broadcaster Tuesday. “So it is perfectly possible to see arms disappear in the hands of extremists and jihadists. And, second, it is a real proliferation. There are enough arms in the field, not only in Syria but also in the neighbouring countries.”
France and Britain so far have not specified what weapons they might send in. German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, told Die Welt newspaper on Tuesday: “Germany will not deliver any weapons to the Syria conflict and we note that no other European country has expressed the intention to do so in the near future.”
France and Britain acted amid growing concerns that Assad's may have resorted to use of its vast chemical weapons stockpile against the rebels. French military authorities on Tuesday were analyzing medical samples from patients who had been hospitalized after inhaling poison gas in Syria to see if they can determine that such weapons were used.
French daily Le Monde said its reporters who travelled to Syria recently submitted the samples, taken by Syrian doctors, to the French government for analysis. The newspaper said patients' symptoms “resemble the effects produced by neurotoxic agents present in the Syrian chemical arsenal.”
The French Defence Ministry has confirmed it is analyzing the samples, but would not comment further.
The White House has said that U.S. intelligence concluded that Assad's regime has probably used deadly chemical weapons at least twice — but U.S. officials said the intelligence wasn't strong enough to justify sending significant U.S. military support to the rebels. President Barack Obama has said the use of chemical weapons would cross a “red line.”
Original Article
Source: thestar.com
Author: Jamey Keaten
No comments:
Post a Comment