Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, September 22, 2023

Putin appeals to Russians to vote to allow him to stay in office until 2036

Vladimir Putin has exhorted fellow Russians to vote for a slew of constitutional amendments that would also let him stay in office until 2036.

Standing before a new statue commemorating the efforts of Soviet soldiers during the second world war on the day before voting ends, Putin appealed to ordinary Russians’ patriotism and their desire for stability without mentioning the stark political implications the vote would have by resetting his term limits and allowing him to seek re-election twice more as president.

“I am sure that each of you, when making such an important decision, thinks first of all about your loved ones, and is based on the values that unite us, which are truth and justice, respect for people of work, for people of older generations, family and care for children, their health, moral and spiritual education,” Putin said in the address, which was broadcast nationally.

The amendments will “enshrine these values and principles among the highest, unconditional constitutional guarantees. We can guarantee stability, safety, wellbeing and a decent life only through development, only together and only ourselves,” he added.

Russia’s constitutional vote, an ad-hoc plebiscite that is not quite a referendum, has seen a massive get-out-the-vote effort. Local governments have enticed voters with raffles and cash prizes to increase the turnout.

A state-owned pollster has already released a controversial exit poll claiming 76% of voters supported the amendments. The Kremlin is keen to have a high turnout in the vote, which culminates on Wednesday, to show that Putin and his platform enjoy broad support.

Critics have attacked the vote, which has continued for a week and allowed online voting, as impossible to monitor. One video circulating on social media showed a family arriving at a polling station this week to discover they had all already voted, according to the official register. When they confronted the head of the polling station, she slams the register shut, telling them to prove it.

Analysts have said polling numbers indicate the Kremlin’s desires rather than the reality at the ballot box. VCIOM, the state-run pollster that released the exit polls, was lightly chastised for interfering in the ongoing vote, but not punished.

“I always said we should have a president-for-life,” the Chechen leader, Ramzan Kadyrov, said on Tuesday, giving voice to the subtext of the nationwide vote. “Who can replace him? There’s no political leader of international standing. We should be proud of this.”

Original Article
Source: theguardian
Author: Andrew Roth in Moscow

No comments:

Post a Comment