Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, February 23, 2012

EU blocks passage of Canada’s oil sands ranking


Amid heavy lobbying from Canada, a committee of the European Union Parliament blocked passage of a proposed fuel quality directive that would label Alberta oil sands as a more carbon-intensive source of oil than conventional crude.

In a vote Thursday, proponents of the directive failed to win a majority of votes in favour, but neither was there a majority to kill the proposal. As a result, the directive will be taken up by a committee of EU ministers in the coming months.

Key Canadian allies abstained on the vote, including Britain, France and the Netherlands – all home to multinational oil companies that have invested heavily in the oil sands.

The Harper government has been lobbying for two years to prevent the EU from targeting the oil sands due to its high emissions of greenhouse gases compared to conventional crude.

Under the fuel quality directive, EU refiners and marketers would be required to reduce the carbon-content of their overall fuel mix. The regulatory ascribed specific carbon-content levels to types of fuel, including bitumen from the oil sands.

Oil sands producers and governments in Alberta and Canada staunchly opposed the measure, fearing it would create a precedent for U.S. states considering similar measures, and impact on investment from international oil companies based in Europe.

Companies like Britain’s BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell PLC of The Netherlands, and France’s Total SA, are expanding operations in the oil sands, but have faced shareholder resolutions urging them to disinvest.

Ottawa has threatened to challenge any fuel quality directive that punishes the oil sands and take the EU to the World Trade Organization.

Toronto trade lawyer Lawrence Herman, of Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, said Canada would have a strong case because WTO members are not allowed to discriminate against “like” products from different countries. And “like” is definite by the characteristic of the end product – in this case, gasoline or diesel – and not the process by which it is made.

Greenpeace said the EU ministers will now be held accountable if they allow Canadian lobbying to defeat a regulation that is meant to battle climate change and reduce emissions from Europe’s transportation fuels.

“Now that the tar sands issue is finally in the hands of publicly accountable ministers, we will see who’s pulling the strings in Europe,” Greenpeace tranport policy adviser, Franziska Achterberg said in a statement Thursday.

“The evidence is clear: tar sands are the world’s dirtiest fuels. The decision is even clearer: the ministers should stand up to the oil industry and ban them from Europe.”

Original Article
Source: Globe
Author: shawn mccarthy 

No comments:

Post a Comment