As the brainchild of the late Izzy Asper – his photo appears on the home page of its website – the newly-opened Canadian Museum for Human Rights was always bound to be controversial. I was friendly with Izzy and liked him a lot, but I was always concerned that some of his passionately-held views didn’t at all fit with a passion for human rights, a contradiction he never recognized.
But to be fair, with or without Izzy, controversy was built in to the Museum’s very raison d’etre, and I don’t envy some of the small-p political choices its officials had to make. (I am told I appear in the section on the Rwanda genocide.) The institution bit off a huge chunk of territory, much of it inherently sensitive, antagonizing vested interests, and inevitably leaving disappointed parties in its wake.
But to be fair, with or without Izzy, controversy was built in to the Museum’s very raison d’etre, and I don’t envy some of the small-p political choices its officials had to make. (I am told I appear in the section on the Rwanda genocide.) The institution bit off a huge chunk of territory, much of it inherently sensitive, antagonizing vested interests, and inevitably leaving disappointed parties in its wake.