Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Showing posts with label James Gorman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Gorman. Show all posts

Thursday, May 31, 2012

James Gorman, Morgan Stanley CEO, Defends Bank's Handling Of Facebook IPO

The chief of the bank that some say had a hand in botching Facebook's IPO isn't apologizing for anything.

James Gorman, chairman and CEO of Morgan Stanley, the bank that was the lead underwriter for Facebook's IPO, said in a meeting on Tuesday that Morgan Stanley worked "100 percent within the rules," the Wall Street Journal reports.

He said that though it was "disappointing" that Facebook's stock price has plunged since the IPO, "speculation of nefarious activity" during the preparation for the IPO was false, according to the WSJ. He said he was not "aware of any dissent" about Facebook's steep IPO price among the banks that underwrote Facebook's IPO.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Morgan Stanley CEO To Disgruntled Employees: 'If You're Really Unhappy, Just Leave'

The CEO of one of the country's largest investment banks has some choice words for any employees upset about the prospect of a smaller paycheck this year.

James Gorman, the head of Morgan Stanley, said that if his workers are so angry about their latest, trimmed-down paycheck, it's probably time for them to go. Gorman stands in contrast with many of his executive counterparts, who have largely stayed silent on the issue of declining compensation, despite an industry-wide restructuring.

"I say [to disgruntled Morgan Stanley employees], listen, you're naive, read the newspaper, number one," Gorman said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. "Number two, if you put your compensation in a one year context to define your overall level of happiness, you've got a problem that is bigger than the job. And number three, if you're really unhappy, just leave. Life's too short."

Morgan Stanley announced earlier this month that it would cap cash bonuses for 2011 at $125,000 and that its executives -- including Gorman -- wouldn't be getting any cash bonuses, according to The New York Times.

Gorman and his employees at Morgan Stanley aren't the only ones on Wall Street contending with smaller paychecks. Anxiety over the state of the global economy, slow dealmaking and a boost in public anger over the financial industry's high pay have likely pushed firms to slash their compensation pools to the lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis, the Wall Street Journal reports.

And that's for those that've kept their jobs. All told, Wall Street laid off more than 200,000 employees in 2011 alone.

"The world has changed and the banking industry has gone through a fundamental change and we have to readjust," Gorman said in the interview.

Many workers have had trouble coming to terms with the new reality. Bonus day at Goldman Sachs last week was a "bloodbath," one mid-level employee told CNBC, as some workers learned they would be taking home smaller bonuses this year -- and some none at all. In addition, the firm cut the pay of some if its senior workers in half.

Investment bankers at Bank of America also found out earlier this week that their compensation would be slashed by 25 percent. That's part of a larger push to cut total costs at America's second-largest bank by as much as $8 billion per year.

Original Article
Source: Huff  
Author: -