Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Showing posts with label Nepotism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nepotism. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 03, 2013

Nepotism In Canada: Chart Shows How Top 1% Use Hiring To Keep Wealth In Family

We’ve all heard stories of nepotism in the workplace — people rising through the ranks thanks to a helping hand from an influential relative.

Now a research paper from University of Ottawa economist Miles Corak shows how nepotism helps the wealthiest people in society retain their riches.

Tuesday, August 02, 2011

Is the Fourth Estate Really Facing a Crisis?

The News of the World scandal simply reveals the dangers of nepotism in large, publicly held corporations.


The British media have been complicit in attempts to spin a broader moral or theme from the hacking debacle, and this has, worryingly, been focused on the state of journalism. The implicit – and often explicit – message is that the fourth estate is faced with a crisis: Its reputation is under assault, its freedom is being questioned, and its methods and practitioners are being tacitly impugned. But this narrative, which is increasing in currency and traction to the point of becoming axiomatic, misrepresents the nature of this scandal entirely – particularly with regard to the light it sheds on the British media.