Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Showing posts with label Private Bills. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Private Bills. Show all posts

Monday, April 08, 2013

Take none of hewing, crying over private members’ business at face value

OTTAWA—There was a great deal of hewing and crying around the recent privilege appeals by a number of backbench Tory MPs concerning their access to both Standing Order 31 speaking slots, as well as the content of those prospective statements.

The story lines bounced between the random actions of a few rogue MPs to open caucus revolt, and a fairly consistent condemnation of anything seen to constrain the freedom of MPs to speak their minds. This sounds like fairly serious stuff, but in all things political, I would suggest that you take none of this at face value.

Friday, May 11, 2012

Private member’s bills cut corners on lawmaking, say critics

OTTAWA—The federal Conservative government is shifting the way lawmaking is done. Private member’s bills — which get less legislative analysis or parliamentary debate than government bills — are the new black.

Since Sunday, four private member’s bills that make changes to criminal and corrections law have been publicly backed by the government as good additions to its tough-on-crime agenda.

Here’s what the latest batch would do: create a new criminal offence for recruiting young people into gangs, levy $5,000 fines or jail terms up to 10 years for wearing a mask or face paint at a riot (five years if it’s an “unlawful assembly”), give federal prison officials more authority to dismiss inmate grievances by deeming them “vexatious” or “frivolous,” and set up a forced debt recovery scheme for inmates who win money from lawsuits against the Crown to require payment of outstanding child support, restitution orders or victim surcharges.