Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Showing posts with label OECD Report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OECD Report. Show all posts

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Inequality surges in world’s richest countries, esp. in times of crisis

Not only has social inequality risen in the industrialized nations over the past three decades, the economic crisis of 2008-09 sped up the deterioration as “pain of the crisis was not evenly shared,” a new report says.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which unites the world’s most developed countries, has published an update to its report ‘Divided We Stand’. The report published in December 2011 showed that by 2008 the industrialized nations had the worst situation with inequality in three decades.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

OECD Report On Corporate Taxes Finds Multinationals Are Dodging Their Fair Share

PARIS - The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development says large multinationals are using legal loopholes to avoid paying their fair share of taxes and that global solutions are needed to combat the problem.

The OECD report says many rules designed to protect multinational corporations from being double-taxed go too far and sometimes allow them to pay no taxes at all.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

OECD praises the end of Wheat Board monopoly

The federal government has won praise from the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development for dismantling the Canadian Wheat Board’s monopoly over the sale of wheat and barley grown in Western Canada.

The controversial decision to effectively eliminate the Wheat Board “is a positive step to enhance proactive risk management by farmers,” the OECD said in a report on global agriculture policy released Wednesday.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Thomas Mulcair’s Dutch Disease warning supported by OECD report

A new OECD report seems to support controversial claims by NDP leader Thomas Mulcair that Canada is suffering from an economic condition known as Dutch Disease.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development warns in a report released Wednesday that the run-up in commodity prices is leading to an uneven economy in Canada.

As well, it says the country needs to do more to develop non-resource aspects of the economy so as to maintain high levels of employment and an equitable distribution of wealth across regions.

Canada’s flagging productivity

The OECD has taken yet another swipe at Canada’s sluggish productivity.

Canada’s economy has weathered the global economic crisis well thanks to timely fiscal stimulus, low interest rates, a solid banking sector, and revenues from natural resources, according to the study by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, released Wednesday.

But our workforce will have to become more productive to sustain our high standard of living as the workforce shrinks.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

OECD urges Canada to raise rates

An influential international body is urging Canada’s central bank to raise interest rates in the fall, and continue doing so through 2013 to cool housing prices and contain inflation.

The Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s prescription for monetary policy will stoke the already hot debate about whether the Bank of Canada’s interest rate stance is inflating a housing bubble.

Governor Mark Carney and other officials say the days of ultra-cheap money are coming to an end, although they so far have declined to be more specific. The OECD, a high-powered economic research group backed by contributions from its 34 rich country members, offers a scenario: An increase in the benchmark rate of a quarter of a percentage point in the autumn, and similar increases each quarter through to the end of next year, leaving the benchmark overnight target at 2.25 per cent.

Wednesday, December 07, 2011

Mind the OECD credibility gap

Further to Toby's post, the OECD report on inequality is well worth a careful read.

It bolsters, through careful empirical and cross-country analysis, two key arguments long advanced by the labour movement and progressive economists:

- Key trends in the labour market -- widening wage disparity between top earners and the rest, and the disproportionate growth of precarious jobs -- are the major driving force behind rising inequality of individual earnings which has in turn been a major force behind increased inequality of family incomes.

- The impact of growing earnings inequality on the distribution of family income has been compounded by major regressive changes to the redistributive role of the tax and transfer system.

"Globalization" is found to have played a lesser role -- though a link is drawn from greater competition and closer economic integration with developing countries to the erosion of pro-equality institutions (e.g. unions and collective bargaining) and policies (e.g. labour market regulation, and tax and transfer policies).

The report sees the "sociological" causes of inequality (the growth of single-parent families and the polarization between high and low income dual earner couples driven by "associative sorting" (or like marrying like) as relatively minor. This is important since it undermines an argument that the causes of rising inequality are largely beyond the reach of public policy.

It is ironic, though, that this OECD report (emanating from the employment and social policy side of the organization, DELSA) flags as the underlying causes of inequality precisely those policies which the economic side (ECO) advocated for so strenuously through at least the 1990s and much of the past decade as well.

OECD Country Reports dating back at least to the first OECD Jobs Study of the early 1990s are prepared by ECO and advocated "flexible" labour markets to generate jobs. The key argument was that employment growth required labour market de-regulation, and that we should not be too concerned if the jobs being created were insecure and poorly paid. Relatedly, reports advocated major cuts to unemployment insurance and welfare programs which were seen as needed to make wages flexible and to reduce taxes.

The OECD endorsed the draconian Liberal government cuts to social programs -- cuts to UI and cuts in transfers to the provinces to finance social assistance -- which are now seen as a key driving force of the surge in inequality in Canada which began in the mid-1990s. The OECD also raised no criticism of personal income tax changes which increased after tax income inequality, notably the cut from 75 per cent to 50 per cent of capital gains included in income tax.

Now they tell us that the Canadian tax/transfer system offsets only 40 per cent of any increase in market income inequality -- one of the lowest proportions in the OECD -- compared to 70 per cent in the mid-1990s when Canada's redistributive effort was at near Nordic levels!

The OECD Country Note for Canada put out with the inequality report is a keeper, and should be kept close to hand by the OECD Economics Department and by all of the NDP leadership hopefuls (and Bob Rae too!)

First and foremost, it calls for "more and better jobs that offer good career prospects and a real chance to escape poverty."

It pretty explicitly calls for higher income taxes for the very affluent:

"The growing share of income going to top earners means that this group now has a greater capacity to pay taxes. In this context governments may re-examine the redistributive role of taxation to ensure that wealthier individuals contribute their fair share of the tax burden."

It calls for "well conceived income support policies" for lower income families -- which signals some support for spending more on top of increased investments in training.

And it calls for "freely accessible and high-quality public services, such as education, health and family care." (The OECD have actually long been critical of the lack of a coherent child-care and early learning program in Canada.)

Origin
Source: Rabble.ca