NATO not involved in foreign weapon deliveries to Libya

TRIPOLI — NATO was not involved in a French airlift of weapons to Libyan rebels, the alliance’s chief said on Thursday, sharpening differences over how far Western powers should go to oust Moammar Gadhafi.

France on Wednesday became the first NATO country to openly acknowledge arming rebels seeking to topple Gadhafi, who has resisted an uprising against his rule that has turned into the bloodiest of the “Arab Spring” revolts sweeping the region.

The French weapons airlift has ruffled diplomatic feathers, with some governments questioning whether it contravenes a United Nations arms embargo and goes beyond the terms of a UN resolution authorizing the use of force to protect civilians.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, was asked by reporters on a visit to Vienna if NATO was involved in the French move. “No,” he answered.

“As regards compliance with the UN Security Council resolution, it is for the UN sanctions committee to determine that,” Rasmussen said.

China, a permanent member of the Security Council which has taken a cautious line on military intervention in Libya, weighed into the debate, though it stopped short of criticizing France.

“China urges the international community to strictly abide by the spirit of the relevant UN Security Council resolution and not take any actions that exceed the authority granted by that resolution,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said when asked about France’s action.

In the rebel-held city of Misrata, about 200 kilometres east of Tripoli, six rockets landed early on Thursday in the Habara district, near the city’s oil refinery and port. A Reuters journalist in Misrata said there were no casualties.

Britain’s military said its Apache helicopters had attacked a government checkpoint and two military vehicles near Khoms, on the Mediterranean coast between Misrata and Tripoli.

Insurgents in the area say Gadhafi’s forces are massing, and bringing up weapons, to quell an uprising in the nearby town of Zlitan, though this cannot be independently verified.

‘FLAGRANT VIOLATION’

Russia's foreign minister says France violated a United Nations resolution by dropping weapons to the Libyan opposition fighting Mommar Gadhafi's forces.

Sergey Lavrov says his ministry has formally asked Paris for information about the move.

He said Thursday that if confirmed, airlifting weapons to the opposition would represent a “flagrant violation” of the UN Security Council resolution that sanctioned the military operation in Libya.

Russia abstained in the UN vote on Libya and has voiced concern about civilian casualties and excessive use of force by NATO.

French military spokesman Col. Thierry Burkhard said Wednesday that the weapons deliveries took place in early June in the western Nafusa Mountains, when Gadhafi's troops had encircled civilians and blocked humanitarian aid shipments.

NATO’S DILEMMA

France said on Wednesday it did not break a UN arms embargo by airlifting weapons to Libya’s rebels because the weapons were needed to defend civilians under threat.

Le Figaro newspaper said France had parachuted rocket launchers, assault rifles and anti-tank missiles into the Western Mountains region, southwest of Tripoli, in early June. A military spokesman later confirmed delivery of arms.

The French airlift highlights a dilemma facing NATO in Libya. If it sticks to the letter of the UN resolution, Gadhafi could hold on to power for months.

But if it takes a more proactive role in helping the rebels, the already fragile coalition backing military action could fall apart.

At an African Union summit in Equatorial Guinea, AU Commission chief Jean Ping said arms going into Libya could end up in the hands of Al Qaeda allies in the region.

“Africa’s concern is that weapons that are delivered to one side or another ... are already in the desert and will arm terrorists and fuel trafficking,” Ping told reporters.

Even France’s allies reacted cautiously. British Minister for International Security Gerald Howarth said he had no criticism of France’s actions, but added: “It’s not something we shall be doing.”

The rebels, though, encouraged more arms deliveries. “Giving (us) weapons we will be able to decide the battle more quickly, so that we can shed as little blood as possible,” senior rebel figure Mahmoud Jibril told a news conference in Vienna.

Full Article
Source: Toronto Star