One theory of the student “strike” that continues this week with massive nightly demonstrations in Montreal – some peaceful, some not – is that it is a “Quebec thing.” Or maybe a French thing, or a francophone thing. In any case, the theory says, it’s not a “Canadian” thing. Hikes to tuition elsewhere in Canada, where fees are generally vastly higher to begin with, might spawn a march or two, but nothing like this. Too great a sense of entitlement, too great a dependence on government (the so-called “Quebec model”), too many Marxist poli-sci professors, something in the water – whatever it is, it is exclusive to one of our founding peoples.
There is certainly much to this. This is by no means Quebec’s first student strike. In an article in La Presse in January, political scientist Benedict Lacoursière counted eight of them since 1968 (this is the ninth), and noted their excellent record of success in avoiding tuition hikes. William Johnson, the political commentator and former president of Alliance Quebec, argued recently that the province’s low tuition has never been “a choice made deliberately by a socially conscious government,” but rather the result of “blackmail on Union Nationale, Liberal and Parti Québécois governments by student action in the streets.”
There is certainly much to this. This is by no means Quebec’s first student strike. In an article in La Presse in January, political scientist Benedict Lacoursière counted eight of them since 1968 (this is the ninth), and noted their excellent record of success in avoiding tuition hikes. William Johnson, the political commentator and former president of Alliance Quebec, argued recently that the province’s low tuition has never been “a choice made deliberately by a socially conscious government,” but rather the result of “blackmail on Union Nationale, Liberal and Parti Québécois governments by student action in the streets.”