Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Police wrong to question man with crossbow near G20 fence, judge rules

Police breached the rights of a man arrested with a crossbow near the G20 security fence when they questioned him without a lawyer present, a judge has ruled.

“The law makes clear that an investigative detention of that kind gives rise to a right to counsel,” provincial court Justice David Fairgrieve said Wednesday as he excluded all the statements made by Gary McCullough to a police officer who questioned him at the scene.

McCullough, 54, was arrested in downtown Toronto on June 24, 2010, just two days before world leaders met here, after police found a loaded crossbow in his car’s roof carrier.

The judge also agreed with defence criticisms of Toronto police for continually denying McCullough’s rights to counsel while he was held at the Eastern Ave. detention centre for G20 detainees.

“It was clear that nobody was taking responsibility” for getting McCullough to a lawyer, the judge said. “Nobody did anything.”

Defence lawyer James Carlisle had argued that it was a “systematic” breach.

Carlisle said police at the holding centre told McCullough four times he would be given access to a lawyer, but it never happened until much later despite there being duty counsel on site.

By the time he did get to speak to a lawyer, he had been questioned by at least four officers, Carlisle said.

His arrest on June 24, 2010 on a count of weapons dangerous, just two days before the G20 Summit of world leaders was about to begin, garnered international headlines.

While an officer was unloading the crossbow, propane canisters, chainsaw, knife, hatchet and other objects from his roof carrier, another constable started asking McCullough questions.

Const. George Maxwell testified that McCullough told him he possessed the crossbow in case he encountered a neighbour who had broken into his car as it was parked at his Haliburton property.

McCullough, when he testified, gave a different explanation for why he had acquired the crossbow, saying he had purchased it to scare off bears.

In the judge’s ruling, he excluded both McCullough’s statements to Maxwell and his own subsequent testimony at trail.

Carlisle told reporters after the ruling that he will inform the judge Friday about whether his client will testify again.

When he testified, McCullough explained that after the neighbour at his Haliburton home broke his car’s window, he decided to drive to Toronto to get it fixed because service in the big city is faster than in cottage country.

He loaded the crossbow and other objects of value into the roof rack to keep them away from his neighbour while he was away, he explained.

Origin
Source: Toronto Star 

No comments:

Post a Comment