Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Budget axe could cut deeper and hit sooner, Tories warn

The Conservative government is confirming what it’s been hinting at for weeks: Spending cuts in the upcoming federal budget could be twice as deep as Ottawa’s original target.

Rather than aiming for a 5 per cent cut overall and permanent savings of $4-billion a year – as outlined in the 2011 budget – the government is now clearly describing the 5 per cent cut as the low end of a targeted range.

Treasury Board President Tony Clement, who spent the past year leading a cabinet committee focused on finding savings, provided an update Thursday in a speech to the Empire Club of Toronto.

“I have led a cabinet committee to review the plans of federal departments and agencies to achieve savings of between 5 and 10 per cent in their program budgets; in other words, reductions of anywhere between $4-billion and $8-billion,” said Mr. Clement, according to a copy of his remarks.

“My Committee has been working around the clock, reviewing individual proposals. After appropriate deliberations by cabinet and caucus, the results of our efforts will be found in Budget 2012.”

What the government is saying now and what it was saying at the time of the last budget sound similar, but there are important distinctions.

The 2011 budget outlined a deficit-cutting timeline that called for permanent savings of $1-billion in 2012-13 and $2-billion in 2013-14 before reaching the goal of $4-billion by 2014-15. The 2011 budget described the target as being “at least $4-billion in ongoing annual savings,” but there was no explicit mention in the budget that the cuts could be as high as $8-billion.

Officials explained at the time that departments would be asked to submit proposals for 5 and 10 per cent cuts to Mr. Clement’s committee, with the ultimate goal of meeting the 5 per cut overall.

The explanation at the time was that some departments might be cut less than 5 per cent and others could be cut by more than 5 per cent.

Mr. Clement’s comments – combined with recent statements from Finance Minister Jim Flaherty that some departments could be cut by more than 10 per cent – underscore growing expectations that the final cuts will come sooner and deeper than the original plan outlined in the 2011 budget.

Earlier Thursday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivered a speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos in which he promised “major transformations” in the coming months to the way Ottawa deals with immigration, retirement income support, science and technology policy and approvals for natural resources development projects.

On Wednesday, Interim NDP Leader Nycole Turmel vowed to make the Conservatives’ upcoming budget the “fight of my life.” In a speech to the NDP caucus, she said the Prime Minister has his priorities wrong.

In his speech, Mr. Clement repeated his criticisms of public sector unions and the NDP – which vowed earlier this week to fight against deep cuts to government programs.

“Sustainable services by a right-sized public service should be uncontroversial goals,” said Mr. Clement.

“Unfortunately, public sector union bosses, working hand-in-glove with the NDP opposition, only want to perpetuate the status quo. Their only solutions seem to be: hire more, tax more, spend more... . This stand-pat approach by the unions and the NDP will actually translate into mediocre public services.”

Original Article
Source: Globe 
Author: Bill Curry 

No comments:

Post a Comment