Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Occupy Davos? Leaders greeted by doubts about capitalism

The deep snow in Davos this year is no surprise — but the deep doubts about capitalism certainly are. What is Stephen Harper getting himself into?

For decades, this ritzy Swiss resort has hosted an annual celebration of capitalism where luxurious Audis ferry potentates and presidents between lavish hotels so they can bemoan the perils of socialism, high taxes and debt. And yet, this year, the veteran founder and Chairman of the Davos World Economic Forum, Professor Klaus Schwab, declares that "Capitalism, in its current form, no longer fits the world around us."

Really? Is Schwab, of all people, joining the Occupy Davos movement? The business professor who's been presiding over these festivals for the rich and mighty for forty years? Maybe so.

"We have failed to learn the lessons from the financial crisis of 2009," he goes on. "A global transformation is urgently needed and it must start with reinstating a global sense of social responsibility."

Such remarks, from such an insider in the capitalist club, certainly give a clue to the trauma that has hit the Eurozone in its season of debt and desperation. Greece and Italy are under new management. The survival of the Euro remains in the balance.

And into this stew of self-doubt comes Stephen Harper to deliver a keynote address which is shaping up as something of a scolding. Much of Harper's message will be familiar to Canadians — that we have come through the recession better than any other G7 country, thanks to sound banking regulations, free trade and fiscal discipline. Europe, by contrast, must take much more decisive action to get its house in order.

Harper sticks to traditiion

"The European sovereign debt crisis remains an immediate and pressing problem," said Harper's press secretary, Andrew MacDougall, in a preview of Harper's speech.

"It threatens the strong, sustainable balanced growth that G20 countries have made their priority and risks bringing the world to another recession."

In other words, Harper's remarks may be much more in line with Davos tradition than those of its chairman. He will damn protectionism and over-regulation and, far from preaching a "global transformation" of capitalism, he will speak up for Canadian-style, well-regulated capitalism with sturdy "firewalls" against speculative excess.

We'll see how much appetite there is in Europe for this kind of back-to-basics finger-wagging. Harper believes the traditional model of capitalism remains the best available engine for growth and prosperity — but the Davos forum has convened around the idea that something new is required.

Here's a typically Schwabian sentence from the official program: "the necessary conceptual models do not exist from which to develop a systemic understanding of the great transformations taking place now and in the future."

Poetry, it's not. But that's the mood here now. Chairman Schwab has ruled that the usual bromides about free trade and free markets won't cut it anymore. And a closer look at Prof. Schwab's ideas suggests that, like Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney — another Davos visitor — he does think the Occupy movement has a point.

Soft on capitalism?

"Conventional modes of decision-making have become outdated," he announces, arguing that we must now consider the young, the poor, the unemployed. He insists on "the need to integrate new non-state actors who want to have their say ... we need new models where governance processes on all levels integrate these newcomers in the most collaborative way."

Yes, it's a slog — but Schwab gets to the point eventually. We must "seriously address the social impact of globalization," he says. "Growing inequities within and between countries and rising unemployment are no longer sustainable ... We must rethink our traditional notions of economic growth and global competitiveness, not only by focusing on growth rates and market penetration, but also, equally — if not more importantly — by assessing the quality of economic growth."

The quality?

Up to now, it's the quantity of economic growth that's been the holy grail at Davos! Not anymore.

Now, Schwab wonders, "How sustainable is it and at what cost to the environment? How are the gains distributed? What has become of the family and community fabric, as well as of our culture and heritage? The time has come to embrace a much more holistic, inclusive and qualitative approach to economic development."

Holistic? Culture? The environment? Prof Schwab sounds like one of those foreign "radicals" the Harper government accuses of blocking new pipelines.

Schwab even talks about — horrors! — taking the capital out of capitalism: "The success of any national and business model for competitiveness in the future will be less based on capital and much more based on talent. I define this transition as moving from capitalism to 'talentism'."

Well, maybe Prof. Schwab's lumbering prose won't set Europe on fire. But watch out: as usual, he'll be the guy welcoming German Chancellor Angela Merkel for her opening address and he'll be the one moderating the Q & A with Stephen Harper. Few men have been more closely in touch with the capitalist elite over the last four decades. If he's gone soft on capitalism, who's next?

Original Article
Source: CBC 
Author: Terry Milewski 

No comments:

Post a Comment