Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Canada’s police chiefs support Internet surveillance bill


OTTAWA—Canada’s police chiefs came to the defence Monday of the Conservative government’s proposed Internet surveillance bill amid mounting backlash over the legislation.

The nation’s top cops said during a Vancouver news conference the public doesn’t need to fear the bill.

“People need to focus and keep their eye on the ball,” said Warren Lemcke, Vancouver’s deputy chief constable.

“We can’t monitor your emails. We can’t monitor your phone calls. We can’t monitor your surfing unless a judge allows us to do that.”

Among other things, the bill gives authorities access to Internet subscriber information without requiring a warrant and there are concerns that it violates the privacy of Internet users.

The president of the Canadian Police Association said cops aren’t interested in monitoring the communication of Canadians who aren’t committing crimes.

“We’re talking about serious criminal offences,” said Tom Stamatakis.

“Even if the police wanted, in some pervasive way, to monitor phones, ISPs (of the public), we don’t have the capacity. This is legislation that’s designed to give the police the tools to better deal with serious organized crime.”

The backlash over the bill saw the Conservatives agree to send it quickly to committee for detailed study and possible amendments.

Meanwhile, the RCMP said they’ve not yet decided whether they will launch a full investigation into threats made against Public Safety Minister Vic Toews connected to the introduction of the bill.

Toews or officials in his department have provided information to the Mounties on the nature of the threats — described by the public safety minister as criminal acts — but the Mounties wouldn’t disclose any details.

“We’ve received information from Public Safety so what we’re going to do is we’re going to examine that information,” RCMP Cpl. David Falls said Monday. “Depending on the situation, we may or may not initiate an investigation.”

Toews has been the target of a sustained online campaign in response to last week’s introduction of Bill C-30.

Part of the campaign against the bill involved the publication of the minister’s divorce records, while other people are mocking the bill’s supposed powers by sending the minister mundane details of their lives.

A video claiming to be by the activist group Anonymous surfaced over the weekend suggesting the heat on the minister could intensify unless the bill is scrapped.

In the letter to residents of his Manitoba riding, Toews characterized the campaign as an “extensive personal attack by my political opponents.”

Original Article
Source: Star
Author: Stephanie Levitz

No comments:

Post a Comment