Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Quebec government seeks to restart talks with students

Quebec Education Minister Line Beauchamp says the province's negotiation team is working to bring student leaders back to the table.

Beauchamp said she is willing to negotiate with two of Quebec’s student groups, but a third group, CLASSE, will not be invited to the table.

FEUQ and FECQ, the other two groups representing university and college students, said today they will return to the table but plan to bring members of CLASSE as part of their delegations.

Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, spokesperson for CLASSE, said they are ready to return to the negotiating table with the other student associations tomorrow at 2 p.m. ET. They will take two of the seats reserved for the other student groups.

It will be then be up to the government to decide if they can stay.

Talks broke off Wednesday, 11 weeks after the student strike began, after CLASSE, the most militant of the student groups, was expelled from negotiations with the province.

“We can’t ask the government to negotiate with those who use violence as a form of blackmail,” Beauchamp said Thursday.

The two other major student groups walked away from negotiations when it became clear the province wouldn’t come back to the table if CLASSE was there.

The three groups have maintained they are united and won't negotiate if any one of them is excluded.

Violent protests

After talks broke down, Nadeau-Dubois warned: "All this does is pour oil on the fire."

The trouble then erupted over several hours as students swarmed the streets of Montreal and frequently battled with police.

Banks and other businesses, cars, even a police station had their windows shattered by an angry mob that spilled out from a larger crowd of thousands of student protesters.

Montreal police declared the protest illegal just before 10:30 p.m. and deployed chemical irritant and teargas while arresting 85 people.

Several police officers and civilians were reportedly injured.

"As a police officer, as a father, as a Montrealer, am I proud of what I’ve seen? Not at all," said Montreal police Sgt. Ian Lafrenière.

"It’s sad to see something like that. And I had a number of students write me emails this morning saying, ‘You know what? We're sad. We were there yesterday in a peaceful way but unfortunately some people took advantage of it."

Montreal police said there have been more than 160 student demonstrations to date this year in the city.

Unclear when negotiations will resume

Student leaders said it may be time for the province's premier to step in and ensure both sides come to a resolution.

FEUQ leader Martine Desjardins told CBC Thursday that if Beauchamp is taking the student action personally, it may be time for someone else to come to the table.

"Maybe he is the one that is going to let us get to a resolution in this conflict," she said of Premier Jean Charest.

Charest said Thursday his government is still willing to talk to student groups to try to settle the dispute over tuition fees.

However, Charest maintained Beauchamp was right to expel CLASSE from the negotiating table.

“Nothing justifies violence and intimidation,” Charest said Thursday morning. “It must be said [that] the student leaders have a responsibility to denounce violent acts and do so without reservation.”

The government blames CLASSE for either implicitly condoning or failing to control vandalism.

CLASSE has said it opposes the kind of vandalism and violence seen on the streets of Montreal in the last few weeks, but still believes in civil disobedience, such as demonstrations and symbolic occupations of politicians' offices.

Next steps

Desjardins said student leaders are still in Quebec City waiting to go back to negotiations.

"We’re still waiting to sit at the table and make more propositions because, in the last 48 hours, we made so small steps," she said.

"There’s much more to come to have a full solution and a proposition that will fit for all. I think that’s the way to go."

Some pundits suggested that, in the interest of social peace, the Charest government should back down from its planned $325-a-year, five-year tuition hikes.

The government has repeatedly said it will do no such thing.

Some students are now casting this as a deeper struggle with the phrase, "Quebec Spring," emanating from the lips of several protesters who Wednesday issued a medley of demands: the resignation of Premier Jean Charest, a general election, the complete elimination of tuition, and even broader social change.

The very idea of a negotiated settlement remains moot, for now.

It took weeks just to get the government and students to sit at a negotiating table.

Sabotage accusations

Protest groups say a negotiated settlement was never in the cards, and they accuse the government of sabotaging the talks.

They say the government only cares about diverting public attention away from the planned tuition increase, and onto the issue of social unrest.

Recent surveys suggest the dispute hasn't hurt the Charest government politically.

Some pundits, even those who accuse the Charest government of incompetence, or cynicism, suggest it might even help.

Leo Bureau-Blouin, president of the FECQ group that represents Quebec college students, told CBC Thursday that student groups suspect the government is playing politics and backed away from the talks to gain popularity points.

"I think that maybe Quebec’s government, or the Liberals, made the bet that maybe if [the protests] are more and more violent and [there is] more and more vandalism, maybe we are going to lose points in the polls and they are going to win points, because they are going to be the strong leader that refused to talk with the student [rowdies] and the Parti Québécois are going to be the ones that encourage violence and support students," he said.

He said if this were a labour conflict, the provincial government would not have allowed it to go this long without resolution.

Fee hike generally supported

However, right now, polls indicate Quebecers generally support the fee hikes. And one survey this week showed the poll-leading PQ, which has staunchly endorsed the students, losing support and seeing its lead evaporate in recent weeks.

Charest has taken to repeatedly pointing out that his political opponents are wearing, on their lapels, those iconic red squares that have come to symbolize the student movement.

A provincial election must be called between this spring and late 2013.

But with a corruption inquiry set to begin in a few months, speculation is rife that Charest might be tempted to beat an earlier path to the polls and call an election this spring.

That could transform social unrest into a Quebec election issue.

More student demonstrations are planned for Thursday, including an event billed as a “peaceful protest,” organized by the FEUQ and FECQ.

Original Article
Source: CBC
Author: cbc news

No comments:

Post a Comment