Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Canada: Not quite the conservative paradise Republicans think it is

Chatting on the way into Tampa's arena, a pleasant sixty-something woman advised me that I really should watch 2016: Obama's America, a favourite of delegates here that darkly warns of what will result from four more years of a President whose ideological roots are supposedly in Africa. She also wanted me to know how much she likes Canada.

She and her husband live in upstate New York, so they're well-acquainted with Montreal's charms. If Barack Obama wins re-election in November, she said half-jokingly, maybe they'll move there.

It didn't seem worth it to point out that Canada - let alone Montreal - is not quite the conservative paradise she seemed to think. Besides, if I went down that road with her, I'd have to go down it with a lot of other Republicans here as well.

Given U.S. conservatives' previous views of Canada - what with its socialized medicine and its social liberalism and its peacenikiness - it's been a surprise to get almost unfailingly warm responses when I tell people where I'm from. And when they're listening to Republicans speaking to one another, a striking number of sentences begin with "You know, up in Canada..." (Or, slightly less kindly, "Even the Canadians...")

David Wilkins, the South Carolina Republican who served as George W. Bush's ambassador to Canada and was tasked with improving what were then tense relations, has noticed this change as well. "Bask in the glory of it," he suggests. "You don't get credit much."

A confluence of factors seems to have prompted the love-in, among them our role in Afghanistan (which if nothing dulled memories of staying out of Iraq, which in retrospect even some of the folks here wouldn't disagree with anymore) and our oil sands.

More than anything, though, there's our economic success - and the vague knowledge that a conservative prime minister is seen to be responsible for it.

Even if they may be giving Prime Minister Stephen Harper a little too much credit for economic stewardship and overestimating the conservatism of his policies, this storyline fits in some small way into the Republicans' script.

The theme of this week, and presumably of the campaign to follow, is that a leftward shift under Mr. Obama has made it harder to find work or run a business in the United States. If it can simultaneously be argued that amid a rightward shift everything is going swimmingly next door, so much the better.

If Mr. Obama gets re-elected this fall, and Mr. Harper continues to preside over relative economic stability, it's a theme we can expect for years to come. Just so long as Republicans don't actually move north and shatter any illusions.

Original Article
Source: the globe and mail
Author: Adam Radwanski 

No comments:

Post a Comment