Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Monday, September 24, 2012

Jason Kenney to vote in favour of abortion motion

OTTAWA — Immigration Minister Jason Kenney says he will vote in favour of a backbencher colleague’s controversial motion critics say will reopen the abortion debate in Canada.

The high-profile cabinet minister, who is considered a likely contender for leadership of the Conservative Party some time down the road, indicated Monday that he would vote in favour of the motion even though his boss Stephen Harper has promised to vote against it .

“I have said I will vote in favour of the motion and I respect all the point of views of all the ministers and all the MPs,” he said Monday.

“I think we can have a respectful debate on this question and, like I said, the big tradition of all parties in government is to allow a free vote on questions of conscience.”

MPs will vote on Motion 312 on Wednesday.

The private member’s motion tabled by backbencher Conservative Stephen Woodworth calls on Parliament to study the point at which a fetus becomes a human being.

Proponents argue the courts never settled the matter, that the current definition of who is a human being is outdated and that the motion merely calls for a study, the results of which are non-binding.

Critics, however, say the motion is nothing but a backdoor attempt to reopen the abortion debate by those who want to criminalize it.

While supported by a number of other backbenchers, few high-profile Tories have spoken out in favour of the motion. Even Woodworth conceded last week that the motion would probably be defeated.

New Democrats and a number of Liberals have said they would not support the motion.

Original Article
Source: canada.com
Author: Tobi Cohen

No comments:

Post a Comment