It may look good, but the F-35 Lightning II has some serious issues, and
it has a long way to go before it can be rolled out for combat
missions.
It's gone through 20,000 tests of its systems, but has
about 40,000 more to go.
Despite this, it's not likely that the F-35 will ever be scrapped. As we reported
back in November, there are simply too many countries that have invested time and money into the program.
It is, quite literally, an aircraft that is "too big to fail" despite
facing lifetime operating costs for the US Fleet of $1 trillion.
We've gone back and looked at the biggest problems with the F-35 program,
according to an official Pentagon report.
Developed by Lockheed, the fighter has three variants: the conventional F-35A for the Air Force; the F-35B for the Marine Corps, which can take off and land vertically; and the F-35C for the Navy, a carrier version.
If all goes to plan, the Pentagon is on track to spend a huge figure of $396 billion on the jets, including R&D. It doesn't help that the cost to build each F-35 has risen to an average of $137 million from $69 million in 2001.
But more horrifying is not the cost of buying F-35s but the cost of operating and supporting them: $1 trillion over the planes' lifetime. Ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. John McCain, described that estimate as “jaw-dropping."
In 2011, the plane was grounded twice with electrical problems. One incident in August resulted in a complete failure of the integrated power package, which combines the functions performed by an auxiliary power unit, emergency power system, and environmental controls.
They've also discovered major issues with its software, which Air Force Maj. Gen. Christopher Bogdan has called "the gorilla in the room."
And it's supposed to fool enemy radar with stealth capabilities. But stealth coatings have been found peeling off, and the Pentagon report mentions — but does not describe — a "classified" deficiency. Bill Sweeney of Aviation Week says, "dollars to doughnuts it has something to do with stealth."
One variant of the F-35 has shown cracks underneath its fuselage, making many wonder if it can handle the rigors of future air combat.
The concept of tradeoffs is a tricky one with the F-35. The possibility of the fueldraulic system catching fire and incapacitating the pilot was discovered and remedied in 2008, but the fix gave the F-35 a "vulnerability posture no better than legacy aircraft."
The Pentagon also "expressed concern" in its report that it's no better than legacy aircraft in some close air support capabilities. Basically, if you are on the ground in a firefight, you might not be jumping for joy if you find out an F-35 is coming in.
The advanced helmet is supposed to let pilots see data from all the plane's sensors, effectively allowing the pilot to look right through the floor of the plane and all around it. But it has big problems with night vision, delays in displaying data, jitter under certain conditions. More recently, pilots have notices a green glow at the visor's edges and problems with alignment.
Lockheed and The Pentagon aren't getting along so well either. The relationship “is the worst I’ve ever seen, and I’ve been in some bad ones,” said Maj. Gen. Christopher Bogdan in September 2012. “I guarantee you: we will not succeed on this if we do not get past that.”
All of these issues have Congress' eye as well: On the senate floor, John McCain said, "in a nutshell, the JSF program has been both a scandal and a tragedy."
The problems with the F-35 make many wonder why The Pentagon continues with the program.
Original Article
Source: businessinsider.com
Author: Paul Szoldra and Robert Johnson
No comments:
Post a Comment