Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Canadian politics and the 's' word

The latest score: Neoliberalism = 824  Democratic socialism = 7

Okay, I made that up. Democratic socialism hasn't scored that many points in a long time, at least not on the federal Canadian political scene. In fact the route has been so complete, that even mention of the "s" word in considered a political liability -- and so it is, that at its upcoming policy convention the NDP will once again debate whether it should abandon any reference, prominent or otherwise, to democratic "socialism".

But is this just a clever NDP strategy to avoid drawing attention to the fact that Canada is, in fact, a socialist paradise?

Yes, I'm talking about Canadian social(ist) programs, medicare being the largest and most important. Remember the paradigm -- from each according to her or his ability, to each according to his or her need -- hey isn't that the way publicly funded health care works? Ditto for public education, welfare, and a public utilities from water supply to waste collection.

Taken together our governments spend well over 75 per cent per cent of their budgets providing services to Canadians according to their needs, not their ability to pm. And funding for these services comes from a progressive (OK, not entirely progressive) tax system.

So please, no mention of the "s" word, someone might notice!

Original Article
Source: rabble.ca
Author: Steven Shrybman

No comments:

Post a Comment