Journalist Barrett Brown spent his 300th day behind bars this week on a
range of charges filed after he used information obtained by the hacker
group Anonymous to report on the operations of private intelligence
firms. Brown faces 17 charges ranging from threatening an FBI
agent to credit card fraud for posting a link online to a document that
contained stolen credit card data. But according to his supporters,
Brown is being unfairly targeted for daring to investigate the highly
secretive world of private intelligence and military contractors. Using
information Anonymous took from the firm HBGary Federal, Brown helped
discover a secret plan to tarnish the reputations of WikiLeaks and
journalist Glenn Greenwald of The Guardian. Brown similarly analyzed and
wrote about the millions of internal company emails from Stratfor
Global Intelligence that were leaked in 2011. We speak to Peter Ludlow,
professor of philosophy at Northwestern University, whose article "The
Strange Case of Barrett Brown" recently appeared in The Nation.
"Considering that the person who carried out the actual Stratfor hack
had several priors and is facing a maximum of 10 years, the inescapable
conclusion is that the problem is not with the hack itself but with
Brown’s journalism," Ludlow argues. He adds that the case against Brown
could suggest criminality "to even link to something or share a link
with someone."
Video
Source: democracynow.org
Author: -
Video
Source: democracynow.org
Author: -
No comments:
Post a Comment