Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Legal community demands Stephen Harper withdraw criticism of Beverley McLachlin

OTTAWA—An outraged Canadian legal community is marshalling criticism of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, writing an open letter to him and seeking outside international help to reaffirm the independence of Canada’s top jurist.
More than 650 lawyers and law teachers from across Canada released an open letterTuesday calling on Harper to withdraw his criticism of Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin.
In apparent expectation that the government will not back down, a second letter from seven top Canadian legal academics asks the International Commission of Jurists in Geneva to investigate what they call the Conservative government’s “unfounded criticisms levelled at the Chief Justice.”
“We fear that the unprecedented statements of the prime minister and minister of justice and attorney general, which question the integrity and judgment of the chief justice of Canada, may seriously undermine judicial independence in Canada,” says the letter to Geneva.
Harper and Justice Minister Peter MacKay — following a string of legislative and policy defeats at the Supreme Court — suggested nearly two weeks ago that McLachlin acted inappropriately by calling to flag a potential legal issue in the elevation of a Federal Court judge to a Quebec seat on the top court.
Harper and MacKay intimated that McLachlin’s call amounted to lobbying on a case before the court, forcing McLachlin’s office to publicly clarify that she called during a consultation period last July, two months before Federal Court of Appeal Judge Marc Nadon was named.
Harper and MacKay have refused to back down in the face of a storm of criticism that erupted ever since. They have also not moved to appoint a new judicial candidate for the Quebec vacancy on the court.
Tuesday’s letters are the latest salvo in a battle that saw public calls last week by 11 former presidents of the Canadian Bar Association and by the Council of Canadian Law Deans for Harper to withdraw his suggestion.
The first open letter lists 35 pages of signatures by members of the Canadian legal profession and legal academy and says: “We . . . deplore the unprecedented and baseless insinuation by the Prime Minister of Canada that the Chief Justice engaged in improper conduct.”
It continues: “Public criticism of the chief justice impugns the integrity of Canada’s entire judiciary and undermines the independence of Canada’s courts.
Original Article
Source: thestar.com/
Author: Tonda MacCharles

No comments:

Post a Comment