Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, September 19, 2014

Answering a written question from an MP cost the government $117,188

Answering a single written question from a Liberal MP cost the federal government $117,188 in staff time, according to information tabled this week in the House of Commons.

The right to ask departments for written answers is a key tool for MPs – primarily on the opposition benches – to dig up information that can later be used against their political rivals.

The answers can lead to news stories on the details of government expenses, revealing everything from how often cabinet ministers use government jets to how much the RCMP spends destroying marijuana crops.

The process – officially known in Parliament-speak as answers to questions on the order paper – can also provide insight into the impact of public-policy decisions.

But Conservative MP Mike Wallace weighed in with a question asking how much departments spend on answering these types of questions.

Over less than a four-month span up to Jan. 29, 2014, the total was more than $1.2-million.

In an interview, Mr. Wallace said he simply wants MPs and the public to be aware of the costs of these questions.

“I think it’s just important that it’s on the record,” Mr. Wallace said. “I think government and Parliament could run more efficiently and effectively in a lot of areas and this is just one little tiny example of where, are we sure we’re getting value for the dollar?”

The fact that one question cost more than $117,000 might lead the public to ask questions, he said.

“‘Ok, you spent a salary for a person and a quarter for a year. What are you doing with that answer?” he asked.

Plenty, insists Liberal MP John McCallum, who made the request. The MP had asked for a list of all briefing notes provided to all deputy ministers in government. The responses were then divided up among Liberal MPs, who then filed questions under Access to Information – a separate process available to the public – to obtain briefing notes that may be of interest.

“I think those cost numbers are totally inflated,” he said, noting that the answers would have been in an existing database. “It’s inconceivable to me that it would cost anything on that order. But the more important point is this is the cost of democracy. The government spends millions of dollars hiring communications people to keep information from us … So we’re obliged to use the tools that we have available to ask the questions that Canadians want answered.”

Original Article
Source: theglobeandmail.com/
Author: Bill Curry

No comments:

Post a Comment