Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, September 04, 2014

Dear Christy Clark, You And I Disagree On What Taxes Should Be Used For

Dear Christy,

I'm sorry that you did not take my advice in my last letter when I suggested that you should get teachers back into classrooms as soon as possible.

Today I'm writing to you about what you've said in response to the breakdown in talks to end the teachers' strike. You said that you want a negotiated deal that taxpayers can afford.

1/2 We remain committed to negotiating a fair deal with the BCTF as soon as possible, but it has to be affordable for taxpayers.
— Christy Clark (@christyclarkbc) August 31, 2014


This has left me with a lot of questions.

Firstly, your use of the word taxpayers. I'm sure you realize that parents who want their children in school are taxpayers and that teachers are taxpayers and some are parents too?

Secondly, in a rich province such as ours, is it fair that teachers have been spending an average of $1,200 of their after-tax income to provide resources for classrooms?

I think you and I have different perspectives on what taxes should be used for. I see taxes as public funds, our collective contributions to the public good, the spending of which should be prioritized for what our most vulnerable citizens need. Correct me if I'm wrong but you seem to think that taxes are best spent on providing corporate welfare. Do I have that right?

And while we're talking about paying out large sums of taxpayer money, I'm still stunned that your government said it was a good deal for taxpayers when you agreed to pay $750 million to settle legal claims in California against Powerex.

When you were elected, I'm not sure the citizens who voted for you also voted for an increase in your staff's salaries and the items on your credit card bill.

Citizens of B.C. are still not sure how they were roped into paying for the new roof on BC Place Stadium or the Winter Olympics while your party was in power when there are so many other needs in the province. Like childhood poverty.

Does it ever bother you that B.C. has such a high number of children who are starving every day, where the only daily meal they may get is through their school's breakfast or lunch programs? Or that so many teachers store extra crackers and cheese for those students who can't attend to learning because they are so hungry?

I know you and your son wanted to work on a Free The Children project in Kenya but what about working on freeing the children in B.C. from hunger?

But if that's too big a task, how about freeing up their teachers so that children can go to school? At least there they'll get a meal, one way or another.

During the election campaign you promised voters that B.C. would be "debt free" under your leadership so how do you explain the huge debt you have incurred since becoming premier?

I wonder too if B.C. can really afford to entice corporations here with such low corporate taxes when corporations like Imperial Metals leave taxpayers with huge costs like those related to the Mount Polley tailings pond spill.

As you can see, there are many things that confuse me when you talk about what taxpayers can afford.

I am also puzzled by who you mean when you talk about taxpayers. Currently in B.C. the following groups of citizens/taxpayers are registering their dissent with the way you're governing the province: ferry users, seniors, midwives, nurses, health care workers, doctors, truckers, environmentalists, fishermen, parents who want daycare, parents who want their children in school, paramedics, anti-pipeline activists, climate change activists, lawyers, farmers, poverty activists, people with disabilities, and of course teachers.

That's a big group of taxpayers/citizens who disagree with you about what taxpayers can afford.

Did you mention any of this at the big premiers' meeting you were at in Charlottetown?

Kudos @premierbradwall. Looking forward to my pickle vodka - will enjoy it with chips as I watch the @BCLions win the Grey Cup.
— Christy Clark (@christyclarkbc) August 29, 2014

Today would have been such a different day if you had used the pickled vodka to toast the end of the teachers' strike and the re-opening of schools.

Instead, parents all across the province are pondering the costs of not having schools open on Tuesday and the costs they have to bear while you are premier.

With kind regards from a taxpayer,

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.ca/
Author: Lizanne Foster

No comments:

Post a Comment