Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Energy East to ignite pan-Canadian battle over Alberta’s oil sands

So far, conflicts over the expansion of the Alberta tar sands have centered on giant pipeline projects into B.C. and the U.S., where fierce opposition from environmentalists, Aboriginals, citizens and farmers have effectively stymied the Northern Gateway and Keystone XL projects.
Now, Eastern Canada will soon get a taste of these oil sands dramas.

TransCanada said Tuesday it is “within weeks” of submitting its federal application for the Energy East proposal – a gargantuan $12-billion pipeline to pump Alberta crude to Quebec and New Brunswick export terminals and refineries. 
Trans Canada route map - Environmental Defence
Energy East route map by Environmental Defence
The pipeline would cross hundreds of communities, while also approaching major cities – Regina, Winnipeg, Ottawa, Montreal and Quebec City.
“Now all of a sudden, the entire country is under threat of tar sands pipeline expansion with these pipelines coming through their communities,” said Ben Powless, with Ecology Ottawa on Tuesday.
Already on the weekend, one of the pipeline's proposed refineries in the small Quebec community of Cacouna (population 2,002) saw some 2,000 people rally against the TransCanada project, reported the Montreal Gazette.
Cacouna Energy East protest October 2014 - Infodimanche
Energy East protest in Cacouna, Quebec on Saturday - Infodimanche

Nation-building, or climate ruining?

If built, the massive Energy East pipeline would cross six provinces to become the longest in North America, and the third largest in the world. 
The Prime Minister sees the 4,600km pipeline as a grand, nation-building enterprise.
“This is an extremely exciting project,” said Stephen Harper last year while at the Irving oil plant in St. John New Brunswick which also hopes to receive the Alberta bitumen.
“It’s a project that will assure all of Canada will benefit from our energy industry,” he told the Globe and Mail at the time. 
Environmental and citizens’ groups are already ramping up in response to the pipeline. 
The Council of Canadians says the 1.1 million barrels per day pipeline would enable a 40 per cent expansion of the oil sands, and a dramatic increase of climate worsening greenhouse gases.  The pipeline would also transport the bitumen across 961 waterways, the council calculated.

Energy East will likely get built: oil analyst

Yet, oil industry insiders see the project as having a good shot at getting built compared to the beleaguered Keystone XL and Northern Gateway proposals.  Dirk Lever analyzes the oil pipeline industry for AltaCorp Capital in Calgary:
“Nothing is a slam dunk – but this one, compared to the other two has a lot less issues,” said Lever on Tuesday.
A huge advantage for Energy East, said the investment analyst, is that the pipeline does not break a lot of new wilderness.
“It is an existing pipeline.  It has been carrying natural gas for years.  It will now carry oil instead.”
TransCanada pipeline construction - TransCanada photo
TransCanada pipeline construction - TransCanada photo
Using a railway analogy, Lever said while other pipelines propose to build a “brand new railway” across new territories – Energy East is like replacing the rails on an existing national railway that the company already owns.
“Politically, it’s a lot more palatable than building a new pipeline,” said Lever.
A huge economic plus, he said, is the eastern tanker ports also allows Canadian oil sands producers to sell their growing supply of bitumen at a premium world market price, rather than the much-complained about price Americans currently provide.

Supplying eastern Canadian refineries also getting broad political support, even from politicians, such as the NDP’s Kennedy Stewart in Burnaby, B.C. who opposes Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain expansion.
“If we had a west-east pipeline, we could keep those refineries open in Quebec and the Atlantic provinces,” Stewart told a union convention in Vancouver on in February.
“We want to make sure we are using Canadian resources for Canadians,” he added.

So how did Energy East get started?

A detailed Bloomberg account of the project’s genesis found it began with a surprise phone call to the Prime Minister from President Obama in 2011, informing him of his decision to delay Keystone XL.
Soon after, a disappointed Harper reportedly pushed industry for new options to move Alberta’s burgeoning and landlocked oil.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and New Brunswick Premier at Irving Oil Refinery i
Prime Minister Stephen Harper at Irving Oil Refinery in August 2013 - PMO photo
The answer came from New Brunswick’s billionaire Irving family that owns gasoline refineries in Saint John.  The reclusive Atlantic industrialists started talks with Calgary’s oil patch – east/west parties that historically had little to do with each other. 
Conservative MPs, as well as former New Brunswick premier Frank McKenna, pushed it along. 
A huge imperative – oil companies are investing heavily in tar sands’ expansion to supply world demand.  The oil sands is projected to double in a decade, according to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. 
As proof of this trend, on Friday the Alberta government approved the $3-billion Grand Rapids pipeline inside the province against the strong opposition of by Athabasca Chipewyan. The 900,000 barrels per day pipeline will transport the growing oil supplies from Fort McMurray to the Edmonton area.
To some, a West-East pipeline was just a matter of time.
“As [pipeline companies] get blocked in a particular direction…it’s almost like water – they just keep trying to flow it in different directions,” said Art Sterritt, with B.C.’s Coastal First Nations, earlier this year.
Burnaby’s mayor, who has opposed the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion with a series of high profile legal cases, put it bluntly:

“There’s kind of a resigned acceptance that whatever happens, these companies are going to be moving their oil - pipeline, or rail, or by tanker truck – that come hell or high water that oil is coming through," said Mayor Derek Corrigan last month.  

How quickly is Energy East coming?  Fast. 

TransCanada states in its brochure that it expects a speedy federal approval by the National Energy Board, such that by the fall of 2015, it’s a done deal.  By 2016, the company hopes to start construction.
A basic project description with the National Energy Board has been online since March.
Original Article
Source: vancouverobserver.com/
Author: Mychaylo Prystupa

No comments:

Post a Comment