Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, October 31, 2014

Governor Refuses To Say Why He Signed A Rape Gag Rule Into Law

On Saturday, during a meeting with the Plain Dealer editorial board, Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) repeatedly refused to answer questions about why he signed into law a budget that included a provision prohibiting state-funded rape crisis counselors from referring women to abortion services.
The measure, described by critics as “a gag rule,” also strips funding from Planned Parenthood, “blocks public hospitals from arranging transfer agreements with abortion clinics and requires abortion providers to provide ultra sounds on women seeking abortions,” Reuters reported. Clinics that do refer patients to abortion doctors will have their public funding suspended.


But during a heated six-minute exchange about the issue, Kasich would not explain why he supported such a policy. The governor initially shrugged off the pointed question from Democratic challenger Edward FitzGerald and shifted uncomfortably in his seat. Asked again by a member of the paper’s editorial board, Kasich simply reiterated his support for pro-life policies, including an abortion exception in cases of “rape, incest, and life of the mother,” but did not explain how the gag rule advanced that viewpoint. Watch it:
“Why is it pro-life to have a gag rule for a rape crisis counselor,” FitzGerald pressed repeatedly. “If the woman is pregnant because of a rape, why is that pro-life?”
Kasich, however, wouldn’t say, adding only “at the end of the day, I’m going to do what I think is a pro-life, you know, being in a position of being pro-life. There is nothing more I can say about it, I’ve said everything there is to say about it.”
Polls have repeatedly shown that Americans overwhelmingly support maintaining access to abortion services in cases of rape, with 74 percent saying “it should be legal when a woman becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest.”
Original Article
Source: thinkprogress.org/
Author: BY IGOR VOLSKY

No comments:

Post a Comment