Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Monday, February 23, 2015

Prime minister a no-show at Commons' anti-terror debate

Despite hailing new anti-terror legislation as fundamental to the fight against “the most dangerous enemies our world has ever faced,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper did not attend either of two days of debate on the bill in the House of Commons this week.

Bill C-51 is expected to head to committee Monday after the Conservative government voted to limit the hours allotted in the Commons on what Justice Minister Peter MacKay called an “important debate (over) …. extraordinary powers.”

The federal Liberals have said they will back the far-reaching legislation, which would expand the mandate and power of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, criminalize the promotion of terrorism, share Canadians’ personal information more easily across government, make it simpler for police to arrest and detain individuals without charge as suspected national security threats, and other measures. A recent poll showed a strong majority of Canadians back the bill; most also want robust oversight of it.

The Official Opposition, the NDP, has said it will fight the bill as overly broad and lacking any additional independent oversight to ensure the newly empowered federal police and spies  operate within the law.

Harper’s absence from the first two days of debate was explained in an email from PMO spokesman Carl Vallée: “The prime minister has spoken at length with regards to the bill when it was announced and in the House during Question Period.”

Harper unveiled the contents of the bill at a Jan. 30 event in Richmond Hill, Ont. – far away from the House of Commons. He was flanked by senior ministers MacKay, Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney and Julian Fantino, associate minister of National Defence. The bill was tabled in the House the same day.

“We were treated to an election campaign-style announcement hundreds of kilometres away from Parliament, and that revealed their deepest thoughts. This is all a political game to them,” NDP Leader Tom Mulcair said this week.

Both he Liberal leader Justin Trudeau spoke during the first day of debate. The government led off its side of the debate with a statement from Blaney.

Harper has taken questions about Bill C-51 at public events.

For example, responding to a reporter’s question Thursday in Surrey, B.C., , Harper categorically rejected the demands to add provisions to the bill to expand independent oversight of the expanded investigative powers C-51 gives to the RCMP, Canada’s spy agency and 15 other government departments.

“The model we have in Canada of independent, expert oversight – that’s the model we’re pursuing,” he said, rejecting calls for increased oversight by a committee of parliamentarians, similar to what’s done in Britain and the United States.

Original Article
Source: canada.com/
Author: IAN MACLEOD

No comments:

Post a Comment