Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Trudeau calls government reasons for appeal of niqab ruling unjustified

OTTAWA - Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is taking issue with Stephen Harper's rationale for the decision to defend a federal ban on the wearing of face coverings at citizenship ceremonies.

Earlier this month, a Federal Court judge ruled that a portion of the law requiring would-be citizens to remove their face coverings while taking the oath of citizenship was unlawful.

Asked about the ruling last week, the prime minister denounced the court decision, saying most Canadians consider it offensive for someone to conceal their identity at the moment they are becoming a citizen.

But those in authority must be careful when treading on minority rights, said Trudeau, who said Harper's reasons for appealing the ruling aren't good enough.

"Any time a government or a leader is in a position to choose to limit minority rights of any type, there has to be a very good justification — a clear and compelling reason to do so," Trudeau said.

"The reason the prime minister gave last week for appealing the court's decision around the niqab was, to my mind, not at all justifying the prime minister's decision."

Zunera Ishaq, a Pakistani national, filed suit against the minister of citizenship and immigration, claiming the government's policy on veils violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Islamic Supreme Council of Canada, a Calgary-based Muslim group, has called on the prime minister to reverse his plans to appeal.

The group says the Federal Court's decision to allow face coverings during citizenship ceremonies is "not an important issue," but that Harper is making it one unnecessarily.

His reasons for doing so, however, are no secret: the party began circulating a fundraising email Tuesday promoting its position on the issue.

"At the very moment newcomers are joining the Canadian family, we believe new citizens should recite the oath proudly, loudly and for everyone to see and hear," it reads.

"Canadian citizenship confers both rights and responsibilities. The rules for obtaining it should apply equally to all."

The Calgary-based council noted that the identity of someone wearing a niqab during a citizenship ceremony can be verified by a judge before the oath is sworn.

The niqab is worn by some Muslim women in public areas and in front of men who are not relatives.

Original Article
Source: nationalnewswatch.com/
Author: CP

No comments:

Post a Comment