Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Stephen Harper dismisses Trudeau’s charge of dividing country

OTTAWA—Prime Minister Stephen Harper condemned the wearing of a niqab or face-covering veil as “rooted in a culture that is anti-women” as he defended himself against Liberal charges the Conservatives practice divisive politics.

Harper was clearly stung by a speech Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau gave Monday in Toronto that condemned the Conservatives for rhetoric he said threatens to expose Muslims to the same bigoted fears that Jews faced in the 1930s and ’40s.

Trudeau jabbed again at Harper Tuesday in the Commons, citing recent comments by Conservatives about hijabs and temporary foreign workers. Instead of dividing the country, Harper should “get his priorities straight” and table an economic plan, Trudeau said.

Harper retorted that, “With his speech last night it is clearly the Liberal leader who is taking an irresponsible position with respect to minorities in Canada.”

Harper said “almost all Canadians” agree with his government’s position in appealing the case of a woman who objected to unveiling during a public citizenship oath-taking ceremony. (She had agreed to unveil for identification purposes prior to her citizenship test.)

“Why would Canadians, contrary to our own values, embrace a practice at that time that is not transparent, that is not open and frankly is rooted in a culture that is anti-women,” Harper said.

In his speech, Trudeau had accused Harper of “stoking anxiety and fomenting fear” in a diverse Canada and referred to a range of controversial topics, including the debate over Muslim women wearing the hijab and niqab in courtrooms and other government buildings.

Trudeau said in a free country like Canada, individuals have a right to wear the niqab, while others have the right to dislike it, hold it up as a symbol of oppression, or try to convince fellow citizens not to wear it.

But to use the state’s power to dictate in law what women can and cannot wear — thereby restricting their religious freedom and freedom of expression — is “a cruel joke,” Trudeau said.

Original Article
Source: thestar.com/
Author:  Tonda MacCharles

No comments:

Post a Comment