Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

7 Times Joe Oliver's Budget Speech Departs from Reality

Hyperbole alert!

Finance Minister Joe Oliver delivered his budget on Tuesday. Here's seven problems with what Oliver had to say about the state of Canada's fiscal affairs:

1. But is the world an ocean of chaos? And is Canada an island of stability?

Joe Oliver says:
"Around the world, many nations -- including some of our friends and allies -- remain mired in a struggle for fiscal security ... Still the news for Canada is, by and large, good. Amid the tumult, our country remains a beacon of economic stability and security built on a foundation of sound financial management."
Reality check:
According to Oliver's own budget, the recent drop in oil prices is going to mean chaos for Canada.
"As a producer and net exporter of crude oil," the budget says Canada will see "a significant downward revision to the outlook for economy-wide prices and therefore, nominal GDP." And what of the rest of the world? Low oil prices "will be generally positive for global growth," says the budget -- particularly for countries that import oil.
But although it projects "weaker investment and hiring within the energy sector," the government says low oil prices could (eventually) lead to "positive impacts" for other sectors of the economy. Just probably not in the near future.  

2. Is Canadian economic growth, in fact, "solid"?

Joe Oliver says:
"Mr. Speaker, our economy is now substantially larger than it was pre-recession, a performance that remains the envy of the G-7. International observers expect Canada's growth -- already ahead of our peers during the recovery -- to continue to be solid..."
Reality check:
According to the Department of Finance, private sector economists say "economic data to date for early 2015 suggest the real GDP growth in the first quarter is likely to be weaker than expected, or even flat." Economists now say real GDP growth will fall to 1.2% in the first quarter of 2015, while projections for nominal GDP growth over the year have been reduced from 4.3% to 1.6%.
What else? Economists predict oil prices won't rise above $65 this year, and predict a gradual climb to $80 by 2019 (in other words, even after four years, oil isn't expected to return to recent highs).
But since he seems to think the economy is so "solid," maybe that explains why the budget doesn't really include anything to stabilize Alberta's economy?

3. If Canada is the story of "opportunity," is this the chapter where "opportunity" takes a nap?

Joe Oliver says:
"The story of Canada is -- has always been -- the story of opportunity. Opportunity is what has drawn people here from around the world, generation after generation ... Opportunity for themselves and for their families, the opportunity to work hard, dream big, and achieve those dreams."
Reality check:
How's the Canadian dream doing?
"Lower employment in the energy sector will have some negative effects on household income," the budget says. And "lower equity prices in the energy sector will have an impact on household wealth, which could mostly reduce consumer spending."
So, the story of Canada is the story of fewer jobslower incomes and less money in the bank?

4. Is reducing revenues to historic lows something worth bragging about?

Joe Oliver says:
"We have cut taxes to their lowest level in more than half a century."
Reality check:
While the Conservatives can correctly take credit for reducing revenues to historic lows, it's not clear that's something worth taking credit for -- that's the reason Canada didn't have a balanced budget in the first place.
And you don't really think average families are the ones who've benefitted from all these tax cuts, do you?

5. Why are Conservatives taking credit for paying down the debt if they didn't do anything?

Joe Oliver says:
"When our government first came to power, we worked hard to reduce Canada's substantial federal debt. We did it in short order, by more than $37 billion."
Reality check:
Earlier this week, former senior Finance Canada policy experts Scott Clark and Peter Devries described Oliver's history of Canadian finances as pure "fantasy economics."
Here's what Clark and Devries has to say about the Conservatives' fiscal record:
"How does this compare to the Harper government’s fiscal record? In 2006-07, the Conservatives inherited a surplus of $13.8 billion — which they turned into a deficit of $5.8 billion within two years.

Since then, they have been in deficit each and every year. In 2009-10, the deficit reached its peak of 3.5 per cent of GDP. They are desperate now to show a surplus in 2015-16 — one surplus in nine years. Since Harper was elected, the federal debt has increased by over $150 billion."

6. Can you borrow your way to prosperity or can't you?

Joe Oliver says:
"We cannot borrow our way to prosperity -- no matter what our opponents might say."
Reality check:
But a short time later, Oliver says "in times of crisis, a deficit may be the appropriate action."
So can you or can't you? Both these statements can't be true.

7. Joe Oliver, how dumb do you think Canadians are, really?  

Joe Oliver says:
"We are the only government in our nation's history to reduce Canada's greenhouse gas emissions -- proof that emissions can decline even as economic growth increases."
Reality check:
Really? The same government led by Stephen Harper, who only a few short months ago called the idea of reducing carbon emissions a "crazy economic policy"?
Original Article
Source: pressprogress.ca/
Author:

No comments:

Post a Comment