Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Saturday, May 09, 2015

France Gives Spy Agency Sweeping New Powers

PARIS, May 5 (Reuters) - French lawmakers approved a bill on Tuesday to let intelligence services deploy fly-on-the-wall spying devices more easily against suspected terrorists after Islamist militant attacks killed 17 people in January.

The bill, opposed by civil rights groups, some leftists and some members of President Francois Hollande's ruling Socialists, waives the need for judicial warrants to deploy phone taps, hidden microphones, cameras and other devices such as keypad communications readers.

Despite vocal opposition from critics who fear it will lead to mass-scale surveillance, the bill was approved by the lower house of parliament by a wide margin, with 438 votes in favor and 86 against.

Under the new law, instead of requiring a judge's approval, security officials can order surveillance after advice by a newly created supervisory body specifically dedicated to this.

In exceptional cases, surveillance agencies will be able to use so-called "IMSI Catcher" spy devices that record all types of phone, internet or text messaging conversation in an area.

Prime Minister Manuel Valls has defended the law as vital to counter-terrorism activities and denied it was a French variant of the U.S. Patriot Act passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

Nor was it similar, he said, to the widespread intelligence gathering exposed by former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, sparking an international outcry.

"This bill, which provides a framework to the work of intelligence services, gives them more powers to be more efficient in the fight against terrorism and serious crime," he told reporters.

One of the leading worries for critics is a clause requiring web providers to automatically track suspicious behavior, relying on metadata rather than the content of communications.

Government agencies could then demand access to personal web information in cases of particular suspicion.

"Some of us are really worried about a piece of legislation that is unbalanced, gives too much power to the executive branch ... and has the potential to organize a mass espionage of the entire population through modern means," conservative UMP lawmaker Pierre Lellouche told reporters.

Most Socialist and opposition conservative lawmakers voted in favor of the text, while the Greens party voted against and center-right UDI lawmakers were split.

The upper house of parliament will vote on the bill in June. (Additional reporting by Emily Picy, Lucien Libert and Ingrid Melander; Editing by Tom Heneghan)

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.com/
Author: Brian Love

No comments:

Post a Comment