Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, May 29, 2015

Want to Roll Back Bill C-51?

It's clear Canadians are deeply unhappy with the way the federal government views the privacy rights of its citizens. Last week, Bill C-51 passed in the House of Commons. It's now before the Senate and is expected to become law within weeks.

This is a piece of legislation so extreme that experts say it will lead to widespread violations of our charter rights.

Today, OpenMedia, which advocates for more Internet freedom, is launching a privacy plan aimed at rolling back Bill C-51, ending government-supported surveillance and restoring the privacy rights of Canadians.

The report, entitled Canada's Privacy Plan, was the result of a crowd-sourced survey that gathered input from more that 100,000 Canadians. More than 10,000 of you used this crowdsourcing tool to provide detailed input on how you want to tackle our privacy deficit.

Bill C-51 has been widely criticized by Canadian civil liberties advocates. Among other things, it permits federal departments to exchange the private information of Canadians, and makes it easier for police to restrict the movement of suspects.

But Bill C-51 is just one aspect of the alarming privacy deficit the government has created. In the last 12 months, we've seen stunning revelations about how the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSE) -- the agency that collects foreign security intelligence from the Internet -- is spying on Canadians' private online activities and on private emails that Canadians send to members of Parliament.

And we've seen Justice Minister Peter MacKay's online spying Bill C-13 become law, despite opposition from 3 in 4 Canadians.

If there was one message coming through loud and clear from participants in our crowdsourcing process, it's that Canadians are sick and tired of the seemingly endless series of government attacks on their privacy. As participant Katherine noted: "The pendulum has swung way too far in the direction of limiting our privacy. Standards need to be adjusted to make privacy the default and transparency must be mandatory."

Halt privacy violations

When we asked people to rank six privacy priorities, two in particular stood out: require a warrant for governments to spy on personal information, and end blanket surveillance of law-abiding people. Accordingly, we focused first on tackling these key concerns, while also leaving space to address the range of other problems Canadians raised.

Based on this wealth of grassroots feedback, the report sets out three high-level policy recommendations to roll back our privacy deficit:

  • Get a Warrant: require government authorities to obtain a warrant to access Canadians' sensitive personal information. The report also proposes tougher privacy laws to roll back the information disclosure provisions of Bill C-51 and ensure government agencies use personal information strictly for the purpose it is provided. Despite the Supreme Court's R.v. Spencer decision last year, much work remains to be done to prevent warrantless access to Canadians' information.


  • End Mass Surveillance: Halt all surveillance activities that involve the warrantless collection of Canadians' personal information, including the bulk collection of deeply revealing metadata. We also propose that surveillance activities require judicial not political authorization, and that the government cease collecting and analyzing what Canadians say on social media.


  • Embrace Accountability: ensure strong, independent oversight and review bodies for the CSE and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). Rein in the steep costs of surveillance by requiring the parliamentary budget officer and auditor general to develop clear cost projections for surveillance activities.

Over the next two weeks, OpenMedia will write a series of articles on these recommendations. Already we're seeing the power that these crowd-sourced ideas can have. The report's key recommendations have been endorsed by prominent groups from across the political spectrum, from Greenpeace to the National Firearms Association.

In you're interested in participating in the conversation, you can join leading experts today at 11 a.m. PDT/2 p.m. EDT for a live Facebook discussion about the privacy challenges Canada faces.

For too long, this government has ignored Canadians, undermining their privacy rights while treating the democratic process with contempt. We believe the government is trying to keep Canadians in the dark. But as the debate over Bill C-51 has shown, people have had enough of the government's approach.

It's time to turn things around. Our plan aims to turn this debate on its head and ensure that we have the same high standard of privacy protection for our digital communications as we had in the days of rotary telephones and pen-and-paper letters.

Best of all, these ideas come straight from you. You can view Canada's Privacy Plan right now and add your voice by sending it to key senators as they prepare for their crucial final vote on Bill C-51.

Original Article
Source: thetyee.ca/
Author: David Christopher

No comments:

Post a Comment