According to the financial investigation, Walmart is stashing “at least $76 billion worth of assets in 78 subsidiaries and branches located in 15 overseas tax havens.” Though that figure is disputed by Walmart, Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) maintains that these subsidiaries operate as a vast network of shell companies. The report, by researchers with ATF and United Food and Commercial Workers, argues that this arrangement of financial black sites lets Walmart circumvent US tax codes and enjoy minimal taxation abroad.
Luxembourg is one of the cushiest European tax havens: ATF calculates that Walmart has parked about $45 billion in assets in this notorious financial fiefdom. Walmart’s web of financial self-dealing spans a global shell game that shuttles revenues into opaque financial domiciles like the Cayman Islands and Singapore. These are in turn linked into Walmart’s global retail network:
The countries in which Walmart’s international operating companies are owned by tax-haven based subsidiaries include: Africa (360 stores in South Africa, plus 36 stores in Botswana, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia), Brazil (557 stores), Central America (690 stores in Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua), Chile (404 stores), China (411 stores), Japan (430 stores), and the United Kingdom (592 stores)….
The report suggests that Walmart is avoiding taxes by channeling foreign earnings though “hybrid financial instruments and complex inter-company debt arrangements,” including an arcane mechanism of a hybrid loan, and “borrowing” billions in short-term loans from Walmart’s own subsidiaries.
Walmart spokesperson Randy Hargove argued in its public response that it complies with tax laws of the United States and countries where it operates. The company contends that ATF’s accounting is based on misleading calculations of Walmart’s investments in subsidiaries and intercompany loans, and that the official figure on foreign assets is $80.5 billion, mostly in “retail store buildings, fixtures, inventory and distribution facilities physically located” overseas.
ATF isn’t trying to dictate how Walmart spends its money. But since we don’t know how much Walmart contributes to the estimated $90 billion that the public loses each year to corporate tax havens, activists demand a full accounting of just where the money is:
Policymakers in the United States and abroad should press Walmart for accurate and complete country-by-country information on its income and taxes paid, assets, number of employees and more, including for their subsidiaries.
The report also recommends that the Securities and Exchange Commission demand a full public disclosure of “all of the business entities in its undisclosed network of subsidiaries in tax havens,” their ownership and relationship to Walmart’s US-based businesses. More broadly, ATF joins a global coalition of reform groups in calling for a comprehensive international financial-regulatory framework under the OECD to ensure companies like Walmart are restricted from hoarding profits through unfair arbitrage-like scheming between jurisdictions.
But reformers face political challenges in Brussels and Washington. According to Michael Schmitt, a Greens/EFA policy adviser in the European Parliament, the European Commission generally helps regulate companies and can propose corporate law and tax reforms. But on proposals for EU tax reforms, member states must “amend and adopt such a proposal by unanimity for it to become law.” As for imposing stronger overall tax policies: “more far reaching ones like unitary taxation (Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base) are however not likely to become law anytime soon.”
This isn’t just a question of corporate malfeasance, but of social equity. Tax dodging represents one piece of a pattern of Walmart’s disproportionate accumulation of wealth through expansive control of labor, financial, and commercial markets worldwide. ATF Executive Director Frank Clemente tells The Nation via e-mail: “Once again, it’s the Waltons who really benefit from Walmart’s profit-at-any-cost business model, no matter where in the world the profits are sitting…. Of course, the rest of us ordinary taxpayers end up picking up the tab to fund schools, health care, the roads and transit systems, and so on… or suffer because we cannot fund them adequately.”
But if we, as taxpaying citizens, step back and look at the untapped potential of all that hoarded wealth, it’s not hard to imagine ways that offshored money could be put back to use. Aside from paying its fair share of corporate taxes, Walmart could redeploy those assets toward simply paying workers a fair wage: Last year Demos published an analysis showing that by shifting some of its internal stock-purchasing expenditures, the company could give a more than $5-an-hour raise to 825,000 workers who earn less than $25,000 annually. Walmart could also use such reforms to meet the Fight for 15 movement’s demand for a $15 minimum wage across its workforce.
Walmart could furthermore boost wages across its vast supply chain. Food Chain Workers Alliance has pressed Walmart to ensure that everyone working for a US supplier, from tomato pickers to warehouse workers, earns $15 per hour with benefits.
And as a globally taxed company, Walmart could pay more across its global manufacturing chain, including garment workers in places like Bangladesh, where poverty wages have fueled monstrous social inequality and labor abuses. The Asia Wage Floor campaign has constructed a wage scale that multinational brands like Walmart could readily implement in countries where they source low-wage labor: the pioneering compensation framework is based on nutritional needs, family size, and regional cost of living. According to Erica Smiley, director of campaigns of Jobs with Justice, Walmart’s outsized influence on wage standards across the retail workforce shows that,
As the largest private company in the world, Walmart is easily a trendsetter.… the architecture of the modern global supply chain was designed and accelerated by Walmart. And thus we believe their practices and behavior will have a standard-setting effect.
Of course, Walmart is already setting standards, they’re just double standards. And now it seems its executives not only set wages for the world’s workers; it sets tax codes around the world, too.
Original Article
Source: thenation.com/
Author: Michelle Chen
No comments:
Post a Comment