Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Trudeau defends Liberal vote on Bill C-51 as the 'right' move for Canadians

Liberal leader Justin Trudeau has strongly defended his party’s decision to vote in favour of controversial anti-terror legislation, saying he was acting in the “best interests” of Canadians even though the bill has flaws.

Moreover, Trudeau insisted Wednesday that if the Liberals win the Oct. 19 election, they will move quickly to introduce legislation to amend Bill C-51 so that it better protects the individual rights of Canadians.

Trudeau made the comments in a wide-ranging interview on Parliament Hill with the Ottawa Citizen and the National Post.

Asked if he has regrets about his position, Trudeau indicated he thinks he made the right move — despite criticism from his political rivals — and that Canadians will ultimately decide on the matter.

“We took a position based on what is in the best interests of Canadians. And ultimately this is a line of work in which you have to know that if you’re making decisions and taking positions that are reasonable and that flow from your values and your fundamental principles, then people will make informed choices.”

In recent weeks, the Liberals have watched their first-place standing in public opinion polls slip to third — behind Tom Mulcair’s New Democrats and Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservatives.

Pollsters credit part of Mulcair’s surge to the political dynamics associated with Bill C-51, which the governing Conservatives introduced in the months following the attack by a gunman on Parliament Hill.

The bill gives powers to Canadian spies to disrupt suspected threats to the nation, in many instances without the need for judicial warrants. It also lowers the legal threshold required for police to detain suspected extremists without charge and to impose conditions on their release. Critics have complained about the lack of oversight on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and police, and that Canadians’ Charter rights could be in jeopardy.

While the NDP categorically opposed the bill and voted against it, the Liberals voted for the bill and promised to fix its shortcomings if they are elected to govern.

That has led some voters to apparently shift their allegiances from the Liberals to the NDP, say pollsters. Mulcair has also been highly critical of Trudeau’s stance. One of Trudeau’s own candidates in Nova Scotia has even stepped aside because he disagrees with his party’s stance.

But Trudeau indicated he believes he took the right decision.

“One of the things we said from the very beginning, in the aftermath of the shooting on Parliament Hill and throughout the debate, is we don’t want to see this issue more politicized than it has to be.

“Now, perhaps that was overly idealistic in an election year, but at the same time I know that Canadians want both their physical security protected and their rights upheld.

“What came before us is a bill that brought in definite measures to immediately increase the security of Canadians but didn’t do enough to uphold and protect people’s rights.

“And we made a call that we were going to support the bill, push to have it amended, but try and remove it from political debate.”

Trudeau said that, by comparison, the Conservatives and NDP are on either side of the spectrum and are “blasting away” at the Liberals.

“Mr. Harper is playing up fear of terrorists. Mr. Mulcair is playing up fear for Islamic communities, for environmentalists, for First Nations. But they’re both playing politics of fear.”

Trudeau said his approach to politics is rooted in the conviction that he will not “play the politics of fear.”

“You won’t hear me say, ‘Mr. Mulcair, who voted against physical security, doesn’t care about Canadians’ safety.’ And yes, it’s a position that is more easily attacked than the other positions are. But it’s also the right position. Because we are in a position of saying, ‘We will do both. We will protect Canadians’ physical security and uphold their rights and freedoms by demonstrating that we will repeal the parts that are problematic with C-51.”

Trudeau said a Liberal government would bring in “proper oversight” and a clause that requires review of the law every three years.

He said that he will move “as quickly as possible” to bring in amendments, because he knows Canadians want both “physical protection” and protection of rights.

“As the party of the Charter, as the party that has always understood how important people’s rights and freedoms are, as someone who has demonstrated it on a wide range of issues throughout my leadership, we will move on it very quickly.”

Original Article
Source: ottawacitizen.com/
Author: MARK KENNEDY

No comments:

Post a Comment