Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Conservatives bring in former soldiers for extra security on Harper’s campaign

OTTAWA — The Conservatives are using former members of the Canadian military to act as security guards at their election campaign events, in addition to the RCMP officers who are assigned to the prime minister's personal detail.

The former Canadian Armed Forces soldiers, who are travelling with members of the media on the Conservative campaign bus, wear suits and earpieces much like the Mounties assigned to protect Stephen Harper.

One member of the private security team, a former sniper, escorted a man out of a Harper event with the help of RCMP officers Thursday in Markham, Ont., when he tried to line up behind journalists to ask the prime minister a question.

The man was later allowed to re-enter the room a short time later.

Harper continues to be protected by his personal detail during the campaign — an RCMP unit that guards the prime minister both at home and abroad.

The RCMP detail, which is paid for by taxpayers, has only a single goal, and "that is the protection of the prime minister," said security expert Chris Mathers, a former undercover Mountie.

"That is their job," Mathers said. "If anyone else wants security at a venue, then they would have to engage private security contractors to take care of it."

The RCMP is trained to remove the leader when there is an issue at campaign events rather than engage with those causing a disturbance, he said.

Mathers said that's why private security personnel have likely been tasked with dealing with "uninvited guests" at campaign events.

"The segregation of duties is such that any contract security personnel would be doing work for the party dealing with trespassers," Mathers said. "They're not protecting the prime minister, they're there to keep the peace."

Conservative spokesman Kory Teneycke characterized the additional security officers as part of the party's logistical team.

"We don't comment on our event logistics, that's not something that's new," said Teneycke, who took issue with the characterization of the additional personnel as "security."

"PM security is about (prime minister personal detail) ... how we manage the logistics of our events, that's a different matter and we don't talk about it."

Teneycke said the party is responsible for footing the bill for "event logistics and event planning," suggesting the security is being paid for by the party, but he would not say whether they are licensed to work as security guards.

Provinces have different regulations for security guards and private investigators but they are required to have a valid license to work, including in Ontario where Harper has spent the bulk of time on the campaign so far.

Alex Marland, a political science professor at Memorial University in St. John's, N.L., said the presence of security at campaign events is part of a greater conversation about modern campaigns and message control.

"The reality is that all political parties know that what can happen is you can have one person come out, make a wayward remark or engage in something and all sorts of election planning and discussion goes completely amuck," Marland said.

"These things are so tightly scripted, they're so focused, they're quite frankly quite boring, that all of a sudden it introduces a level of drama that the media, understandably, will chase."

Marland said technology is a major consideration because everyone in the room has a cellphone and leaders are under the microscope.

"Every political party is absolutely trying to avoid going off script, ever," he said. "The whole point about having security at these things to is try to avoid somebody else, who has their own agenda ... destabilizing the agenda that you have."

Campaign events are not the "public open forums" that some people may think they are, he added.

The RCMP is also providing security for NDP Leader Tom Mulcair and Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau — standard procedure during an election campaign. Neither party, however, has hired additional security.

Mathers also said it is not unusual for former military members to take on security positions once they have left the Canadian Forces.

"They're just security guards, period," he said.

Lawyer and retired Canadian Armed Forces colonel Michel Drapeau said he finds the decision to hire former soldiers for Conservative campaign security "uncautious, to say the least."

"What's motivating this?" Drapeau said in a phone interview, noting that having former soldiers involved could heighten the risk of a "confrontation" if the mood on the campaign trail becomes tense.

"Is this because the Conservatives want to be seen as reaching out to retired soldiers? If it is, it is not the way to do it. It could backfire on them."

Original Article
Source: nationalnewswatch.com/
Author: The Canadian Press 

No comments:

Post a Comment