Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Saturday, September 05, 2015

Laureen Harper Comment Sparks Confusion About Her Marijuana Stance

Once lauded as an election issue to watch, Canada’s marijuana laws are gaining a little more attention after the prime minister’s wife hinted she may support decriminalization.

Laureen Harper's comment at an Ontario campaign office appears to contrast with the stance underlined by her husband Conservative Leader Stephen Harper against loosening the country’s marijuana laws.

“When you go down that route, marijuana becomes more readily available to children, more people become addicted to it and the health outcomes become worse,” he said during a rally in Markham, Ont. on Aug. 11.

In late August, Laureen Harper stopped at one of the party’s Brampton campaign offices and spoke to volunteers supporting Conservative candidate Ninder Thind.

Harper asked Thind about what issues local voters were repeatedly raising with her.

“A lot of moms are upset about the Liberals wanting to legalize marijuana, prostitution,” Thind said.

“I disagree with that,” Harper said. She then appears to disagree with the mandatory minimum sentences for pot-related offences that were introduced as part of the Tory government's “tough-on-crime” legislation.

“You know, you don’t put people in jail — but there’s a big difference between that and having it next to a school or next to a shopping mall where you can go in and buy whatever you want.

“There’s a big difference.”

Video footage of Harper’s comments was uploaded by South Asian outlet Jhanjar TV. Their discussion begins at the 9:31 mark:


Laureen Harper is often regarded as the Conservative party’s not-so-secret weapon and has kept a busy presence on the campaign trail, meeting with candidates and constituents solo as well as alongside her husband and children.

Mandatory minimum sentences range from six months to three years depending on the severity of the offence. Under the law passed in 2012, someone who grows six plants “for the purpose of trafficking” is automatically sentenced to six months in jail.

In the same year the mandatory minimums were introduced, a U.S. panel of former and current police officials warned the Conservative government about the consequences of launching a war on drugs.

“These policies have bankrupted state budgets as limited tax dollars pay to imprison non-violent drug offenders at record rates instead of programs that can actually improve community safety,” they wrote in a letter.

At home, attitudes have shifted in favour of marijuana decriminalization.

According to an Ipsos Reid-Global poll last month, the percentage of Canadians who support decriminalization hit a new high, with 65 per cent of those surveyed in favour and 35 per cent against.

The online poll was conducted among 1,000 Canadians between Aug. 13-17. The sample has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.ca/
Author: Zi-Ann Lum

No comments:

Post a Comment