Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Obama's Peace Prize Has Been A Disappointment: Ex-Nobel Director

When President Barack Obama was announced as the recipient of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, the decision was met with much controversy.

Obama admitted that he was surprised by the choice. Conservatives were quick to express their outrage and even supporters of the president questioned whether the award was deserved.

Six years later, Geir Lundestad, long-time director of the Nobel Institute and secretary of the Nobel Peace Prize committee, has commented publicly on the decision. In “Secretary of Peace, 25 years With The Nobel Prize,” a new memoir released on Thursday, he said Obama’s award “failed to live up to the panel's expectations.”

“In hindsight, we could say that the argument of giving Obama a helping hand was only partially correct,” Lundestad wrote in the book, according to The Local.

Lundestad, who stepped down from his Nobel roles last year after 25 years of service, told The Associated Press this week that the committee had hoped the prize would strengthen Obama. It “didn’t have the desired effect,” he said.

“Even many of Obama's supporters believed that the prize was a mistake,” Lundestad wrote in the memoir. “In that sense the committee didn't achieve what it had hoped for.”

Several news outlets have reported this week that the former secretary “regretted” the decision to award the prize to Obama. However, Lundestad -- who, as secretary, did not have a vote in the committee -- told the AP on Wednesday that he “didn’t disagree” with the panel’s decision. The effect of the award just “fell short” of expectations.

It’s unusual for Nobel officials to discuss what happens behind closed doors, which is why Lundestad’s memoir has surprised people with its candor.

Other than his comments on Obama’s award, Lundestad also criticized the appointment of former Norwegian Prime Minister Thorbjorn Jagland to the committee. According to the BBC, Lundestad contends that Jagland “should never have been appointed to the committee, which frequently stresses its independence.”

Lundestad has said that he wants to “push for greater openness around the [Nobel] prize, which has a 50-year secrecy rule,” per Reuters.

Annika Pontikis, spokeswoman of the Nobel Foundation, said officials “plan to read the book first before making any comment.”

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.com/
Author: Dominique Mosbergen

No comments:

Post a Comment