Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Madeleine Albright Declares a ‘Special Place in Hell’ for Women Who Don’t Vote for Hillary Clinton

Maybe it wasn’t such a great idea for Hillary Clinton to invite Madeleine Albright to campaign for her in New Hampshire.

During a campaign event in Concord on Saturday, the former Secretary of State declared: “Young women have to support Hillary Clinton. The story is not over!”

“They’re going to want to push us back,” she continued. “It’s not done and you have to help. Hillary Clinton will always be there for you. And just remember, there’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other.”

And while it was not the first time Albright muttered that phrase, the backlash was swift and severe.

Pointing to Albright’s notorious defense of the Iraq invasion, during which she said that the death of 500,000 Iraqi children was “worth it,” observers speculated about someone else who may end up in that “special place.”

The comments came a day after feminist icon Gloria Steinem said in an interview that young women were supporting Bernie Sanders because “that’s where the boys are.”

Donna Smith, executive director of Progressive Democrats of America and Common Dreams contributor, said on Sunday that Steinem’s argument was “really odd ... coming from a woman who has lived her life lifting women up and demanding that as equals to men we have the right to our own minds and bodies. Presumably that includes the right to our own political decisions as well.”

“When we get through this presidential primary season on the Democratic side, I want us to present the best possible platform for all people,” Smith continued. “Right now as I observe this presidential race,  Bernie’s positions on critical issues for working class women like me offer the best hope that lives may be transformed in ways that give all of us the best chance to achieve our potential.”

Kevin Gosztola, managing editor of Shadowproof, argued that comments such as Albright’s and Steinem’s have “degraded debate about feminist issues and boorishly transformed characteristics of personalities into matters of equal rights.”

Throughout the campaign, Clinton has taken heat for her associations, including Goldman Sachs and Walmart. But in recent days, the individuals who have come forth to vouch for her candidacy, including Albright, have raised more than a few eyebrows.

During Thursday’s Democratic debate, Clinton said that she “was very flattered when Henry Kissinger said I ran the State Department better—better than anybody had run it in a long time.” This she said of a person who has been accused of war crimes.

Apparently, as the New Republic’s Michael Tracey put it: “The significance of Kissinger’s well-documented responsibility for atrocities in Cambodia, East Timor, Chile, and elsewhere is subordinate to his reputation as a statesman unbound by partisan loyalties.”

Original Article
Source: truthdig.com/
Author: Lauren McCauley

No comments:

Post a Comment