Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, March 01, 2016

Despite lip service, Trudeau government denies release of memos on openness

OTTAWA — Federal proposals on how to make the government more open are being kept secret.

The Treasury Board Secretariat has chosen to withhold key memos to minister Scott Brison on reforming the antiquated Access to Information Act.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government has promised to amend the access law so that federal information is open by default.

But Canadians aren't allowed to see the advice from officials on how to reach that goal.

The Canadian Press used the access law to request recent briefing notes and memos to Brison on possible reforms. However, entire pages were withheld for fear of revealing government advice, consultations or deliberations.

It is "really troubling" that the public is denied insight into the process, said Sean Holman, an assistant professor of journalism at Mount Royal University in Calgary.

Some passages in the 17 pages of government records have been declared cabinet confidences, meaning they cannot be disclosed.

But the department could have released the pages containing advice and deliberations, Holman said after reviewing the records, noting the exemption is not a mandatory one that must be applied under the law.

"The fact that a Liberal government is choosing to exercise this particular exemption, I think, says a lot about the overall state of mind within government about freedom of information — and about what the public has a right to know, and what the public doesn't have a right to know," Holman said.

"What would be so wrong in letting the public know about what options are under consideration? It would simply result in a debate about those options. The government would be better informed about where the public stands on this particular issue."

Brison's office had no immediate comment.

The pages that were disclosed do confirm that Treasury Board officials see a need to strengthen the right of access.

The Access to Information Act has remained largely unchanged since 1983 and is now out of sync with the digital environment and public expectations, one page says.

The Liberal government made several access reform commitments during the election campaign, including expansion of the law to cover ministers' offices and administrative institutions that support Parliament and the courts.

A House of Commons committee is now carrying out a wide-ranging review of the legislation. Information commissioner Suzanne Legault, an ombudsman for users of the law, urged MPs last week to take bold steps on reform.

Holman said nothing prevents the Liberal government from encouraging openness by default while the review is being done.

In fact, he pointed out, the former Progressive Conservative government of Joe Clark did just that in 1979 after its access bill moved to committee. Clark sent a letter to deputy ministers urging them to "act in the spirit" of the bill even though it would be some time before it took final shape.

The Clark government fell before the bill could become law, leaving it to Pierre Trudeau's Liberals to usher in the Access to Information Act.

Original Article
Source: nationalnewswatch.com/
Author:  Jim Bronskill 

No comments:

Post a Comment