Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Uber Transparency Report Reveals It Shared Data On 13 Million Users With Government

Uber has joined the likes of Facebook and Google in releasing a transparency report, breaking down how it shares customers’ data with authorities.

The company seems uncomfortable with the amount of information it has been asked to share.

The inaugural report released Tuesday found the ride service had shared data on at least 13 million riders and drivers between July and December of last year — most of it at the request of U.S. transportation regulators such as the California Public Utilities Commission.

The data was shared in response to 33 regulatory requests, affecting 11.6 million passengers and 583,000 drivers; and 34 airport reporting requests, affecting 1.6 million passengers and 156,000 drivers.

In law enforcement investigations, Uber received 408 requests for rider accounts, and 205 for driver information. The company complied at least partly with those requests 84.8 per cent of the time.

The transparency report looked only at U.S. data. An Uber spokesperson said the company hopes to prepare transparency reports on Canada in the future, but has no concrete plans at the moment to do so.

Uber thinks this amount of data-sharing is overkill.

“Regulators will always need some amount of data to be effective, just like law enforcement. But in many cases they send blanket requests without explaining why the information is needed, or how it will be used,” Uber said in a news release.

“And while this kind of trip data doesn’t include personal information, it can reveal patterns of behavior—and is more than regulators need to do their jobs.”

Uber says regulators are asking more of digital corporations than of older companies, like taxi services. A taxi might be asked to provide rough pick-up and drop-off data on passengers, but Uber is asked for GPS coordinates.

“We hope our Transparency Report will lead to a public debate about the types and amounts of information regulated services should be required to provide to their regulators, and under what circumstances,” the company said.

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.ca/
Author: Daniel Tencer

No comments:

Post a Comment