Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Uber, Lyft Halt Austin Service After Losing Fingerprinting Vote

AUSTIN, Texas, May 9 (Reuters) - On-demand ride companies Uber and Lyft suspended their services in Austin, Texas, on Monday after a stinging loss in a weekend vote where they had spent heavily to repeal a city ordinance requiring them to conduct fingerprint background checks for their drivers.

The defeat in the Texas capital could encourage other cities to back the fingerprint-based criminal background checks, knowing they can survive a bruising political battle, analysts said. Voters in the city of about 900,000 people said by a margin of 56 to 44 percent they wanted the fingerprint checks to stay.

In their efforts to repeal the requirement that was approved by the City Council in December, Uber and Lyft firms contributed about $9 million to a political action group called Ridesharing Works for Austin, finance reports showed.

Their spending, about 85 times larger than their opponents’, worked out to more than $200 for each vote they received in support of their losing position.

Uber and Lyft have said their existing background checks are thorough and ensure safety, seeing the fingerprint checks as an unnecessary regulation.

After the results of what was called Proposition 1 in Austin, Lyft said it would halt service on Monday and Uber threatened to. On Monday, both had suspended services, the City of Austin said.

Austin Mayor Steve Adler, who opposed the move by Uber and Lyft to get rid of fingerprinting, said on Monday the city “remains open to talking with Lyft and Uber whether they are operating in Austin or not.”

The Austin election marked the first time a major U.S. city has put the regulations to a vote. The vote was conducted after a petition drive by Ridesharing Works, the political group underwritten by Uber and Lyft.

Other places where the company is battling over fingerprints include Atlanta and Houston.

In April, Uber threatened to leave Houston unless the city dropped the regulation. The city has not backed down, and a study it conducted found background checks by Uber and Lyft often missed felonies, including homicide and sexual assaults.

The Atlanta City Council postponed a vote planned for early May to further consider a measure to require fingerprinting for ride-hailing service drivers at the city’s main airport.

New York is only other major city requiring the fingerprint checks where Uber operates. (Reporting by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Frances Kerry)

Original Article
Author: Jon Herskovitz

No comments:

Post a Comment