Last week’s release of the much anticipated auditor general’s report on the acquisition of F-35 fighter planes sparked a furious barrage of media and opposition party outrage.
The word "boondoggle" was revived and, while interim Liberal leader Bob Rae called for Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s resignation, others demanded that Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Chief of Defence Staff Walt Natynczyk be removed from their posts.
In his report, auditor general John Ferguson aimed his sights on Defence Department bureaucrats for allegedly misleading their masters. The office reviewed briefing material from 2006 and 2010, concluding that "neither the minister nor decision makers in National Defence and central agencies were kept informed of these problems and the associated risks of relying on the F-35 to replace the CF-18."
While a quick glance at this statement would appear to exonerate Defence Department senior managers and top politicians, it is the dates in question that beg closer scrutiny.
It was in July 2010 that MacKay staged a photo-op with a full-scale model of an F-35 and pledged Canada’s commitment to purchasing 65 of these fifth-generation, stealth fighter-bombers from U.S. firm Lockheed Martin. Until that juncture, any discussion of replacing the recently upgraded fleet of CF-18s was limited to trade journals, and certainly the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program was not a regular topic of discussion at the water cooler.
The word "boondoggle" was revived and, while interim Liberal leader Bob Rae called for Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s resignation, others demanded that Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Chief of Defence Staff Walt Natynczyk be removed from their posts.
In his report, auditor general John Ferguson aimed his sights on Defence Department bureaucrats for allegedly misleading their masters. The office reviewed briefing material from 2006 and 2010, concluding that "neither the minister nor decision makers in National Defence and central agencies were kept informed of these problems and the associated risks of relying on the F-35 to replace the CF-18."
While a quick glance at this statement would appear to exonerate Defence Department senior managers and top politicians, it is the dates in question that beg closer scrutiny.
It was in July 2010 that MacKay staged a photo-op with a full-scale model of an F-35 and pledged Canada’s commitment to purchasing 65 of these fifth-generation, stealth fighter-bombers from U.S. firm Lockheed Martin. Until that juncture, any discussion of replacing the recently upgraded fleet of CF-18s was limited to trade journals, and certainly the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program was not a regular topic of discussion at the water cooler.








